Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry in daily clinical practice

被引:74
作者
El Maghraoui, A [1 ]
Zounon, AAD
Jroundi, I
Nouijai, A
Ghazi, M
Achemlal, L
Bezza, A
Tazi, MA
Abouqual, R
机构
[1] Military Hosp Mohammed 5, Rheumatol & Phys Rehabil Dept, Rabat, Morocco
[2] Fac Med & Pharm, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Rabat, Morocco
[3] Minist Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Rabat, Morocco
关键词
chronic rheumatic diseases; dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); healthy volunteers; osteoporosis; post-menopausal women; reproducibility;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-005-1916-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Bone mineral density (BMD) measurements are frequently performed repeatedly for each patient. Subsequent BMD measurements allow reproducibility to be assessed. Previous studies have suggested that reproducibility may be influenced by age and clinical status. The purpose of the study was to examine the reproducibility of BMD by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and to investigate the practical value of different measures of reproducibility in three distinct groups of subjects: healthy young volunteers, postmenopausal women and patients with chronic rheumatic diseases. Two hundred twenty-two subjects underwent two subsequent BMD measurements of the spine and hip. There were 60 young healthy subjects, 102 postmenopausal women and 60 patients with chronic rheumatic diseases (33 rheumatoid arthritis, 10 ankylosing spondylitis and 10 other systemic diseases). Forty-five patients (75%) among the third group were receiving corticosteroids. Reproducibility was expressed as the smallest detectable difference (SDD), coefficient of variation (CV), least significant change (LSC) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Sources of variation were investigated by linear regression analysis. The median interval between measurements was 0 days (range 0-7). The mean difference (SD) between the measurements (g/cm(2)) was -0.0001 (+/- 0.003) and -0.0004 (+/- 0.002) at L1-L4 and the total hip, respectively. At L1-L4 and the total hip, SDD (g/cm(2)) was +/- 0.04 and +/- 0.02, CV (%) was 2.02 and 1.29, and LSC (%) 5.60 and 3.56, respectively. The ICC at the spine and hip was 0.99 and 0.99, respectively. Only a minimal difference existed between the groups. Reproducibility in the three groups studied was good. In a repeated DXA scan, a BMD change, the least significant change (LSC) or the SDD should be regarded as significant. Use of the SDD is preferable to use of the CV and LSC because of its independence from BMD and its expression in absolute units. Expressed as SDD, a BMD change of at least +/- 0.04 g/cm(2) at L1-L4 and +/- 0.02 g/cm(2) at the total hip should be considered significant. This reproducibility seems independent from age and clinical status and improved in the hips by measuring the dual femur.
引用
收藏
页码:1742 / 1748
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Thawing of frozen calcaneus bone specimens has no effect on the bone mineral density using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry: a study in rabbits and humans
    Trudel, G
    Koike, Y
    Dinh, L
    Uhthoff, HK
    PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2005, 26 (05) : 769 - 777
  • [32] Beyond Bone Mineral Density: A New Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry Index of Bone Strength to Predict Fragility Fractures, the Bone Strain Index
    Ulivieri, Fabio Massimo
    Rinaudo, Luca
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 7
  • [33] Calcaneus-bone mineral density using single X-ray absorptiometry in Japanese women
    Sekioka, Y
    Kushida, K
    Yamazaki, K
    Inoue, T
    CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 65 (02) : 106 - 111
  • [34] Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry registers bone mineral in the liver
    Koufakis, M
    Söderborg, B
    Kallner, G
    Magi, A
    Svensson, U
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 13 (05) : 523 - 528
  • [35] Comparison of whole body bone mineral density measurements between dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and novel bioelectrical impedance analysis
    Chuang, Chih-Lin
    Lai, Chung-Liang
    Huang, Ai-Chun
    Su, Po-Hua
    Chu, Lee-Ping
    Hsieh, Kuen-Chang
    Lu, Hsueh-Kuan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [36] REPRODUCIBILITY OF LATERAL SPINE SCANS USING DUAL ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY
    LARNACH, TA
    BOYD, SJ
    SMART, RC
    BUTLER, SP
    ROHL, PG
    DIAMOND, TH
    CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 51 (04) : 255 - 258
  • [37] The clinical role of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
    Blake, Glen M.
    Fogelman, Ignac
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 71 (03) : 406 - 414
  • [38] THE BONE-MINERAL DENSITY CHANGE WITH AGING OF JAPANESE WOMEN MEASURED BY SINGLE-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY AND DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY
    HOSHI, K
    YAMADA, H
    TSUKIKAWA, S
    SUGANO, T
    ENDO, C
    SATO, A
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 1993, 253 (02) : 65 - 69
  • [39] Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry overestimates bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in persons with spinal cord injury
    Bauman, W. A.
    Schwartz, E.
    Song, I. S. Y.
    Kirshblum, S.
    Cirnigliaro, C.
    Morrison, N.
    Spungen, A. M.
    SPINAL CORD, 2009, 47 (08) : 628 - 633
  • [40] Soft tissue density variations in thalassemia major: a possible pitfall in lumbar bone mineral density measurements by dual-energy X-ray a absorptiometry
    Yildiz, M
    Canatan, D
    PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 22 (08) : 723 - 726