Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry in daily clinical practice

被引:74
作者
El Maghraoui, A [1 ]
Zounon, AAD
Jroundi, I
Nouijai, A
Ghazi, M
Achemlal, L
Bezza, A
Tazi, MA
Abouqual, R
机构
[1] Military Hosp Mohammed 5, Rheumatol & Phys Rehabil Dept, Rabat, Morocco
[2] Fac Med & Pharm, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Rabat, Morocco
[3] Minist Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Rabat, Morocco
关键词
chronic rheumatic diseases; dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); healthy volunteers; osteoporosis; post-menopausal women; reproducibility;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-005-1916-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Bone mineral density (BMD) measurements are frequently performed repeatedly for each patient. Subsequent BMD measurements allow reproducibility to be assessed. Previous studies have suggested that reproducibility may be influenced by age and clinical status. The purpose of the study was to examine the reproducibility of BMD by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and to investigate the practical value of different measures of reproducibility in three distinct groups of subjects: healthy young volunteers, postmenopausal women and patients with chronic rheumatic diseases. Two hundred twenty-two subjects underwent two subsequent BMD measurements of the spine and hip. There were 60 young healthy subjects, 102 postmenopausal women and 60 patients with chronic rheumatic diseases (33 rheumatoid arthritis, 10 ankylosing spondylitis and 10 other systemic diseases). Forty-five patients (75%) among the third group were receiving corticosteroids. Reproducibility was expressed as the smallest detectable difference (SDD), coefficient of variation (CV), least significant change (LSC) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Sources of variation were investigated by linear regression analysis. The median interval between measurements was 0 days (range 0-7). The mean difference (SD) between the measurements (g/cm(2)) was -0.0001 (+/- 0.003) and -0.0004 (+/- 0.002) at L1-L4 and the total hip, respectively. At L1-L4 and the total hip, SDD (g/cm(2)) was +/- 0.04 and +/- 0.02, CV (%) was 2.02 and 1.29, and LSC (%) 5.60 and 3.56, respectively. The ICC at the spine and hip was 0.99 and 0.99, respectively. Only a minimal difference existed between the groups. Reproducibility in the three groups studied was good. In a repeated DXA scan, a BMD change, the least significant change (LSC) or the SDD should be regarded as significant. Use of the SDD is preferable to use of the CV and LSC because of its independence from BMD and its expression in absolute units. Expressed as SDD, a BMD change of at least +/- 0.04 g/cm(2) at L1-L4 and +/- 0.02 g/cm(2) at the total hip should be considered significant. This reproducibility seems independent from age and clinical status and improved in the hips by measuring the dual femur.
引用
收藏
页码:1742 / 1748
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The precision study of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for bone mineral density and body composition measurements in female cynomolgus monkeys
    Guo, Bin
    Cai, Qijun
    Mai, Jinci
    Hou, Lu
    Zeng, Chunyuan
    Gan, Jiefeng
    Tan, Zhiqiang
    Li, Yuefeng
    Cheng, Yong
    Shang, Jingjie
    Tang, Yongjin
    Ling, Xueying
    Gong, Jian
    Wang, Lu
    Xu, Hao
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 12 (03) : 2051 - 2057
  • [22] REGIONAL VARIATIONS IN BONE-MINERAL DENSITY AS ASSESSED WITH DUAL-ENERGY PHOTON-ABSORPTIOMETRY AND DUAL X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY
    FEYERABEND, AJ
    LEAR, JL
    RADIOLOGY, 1993, 186 (02) : 467 - 469
  • [23] Dual X-ray Absorptiometry in Today's Clinical Practice
    Dasher, Lance G.
    Newton, Christopher D.
    Lenchik, Leon
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 48 (03) : 541 - +
  • [24] A preliminary study of bone mineral density of right calcaneus in Filipino women using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
    Cruz, MMM
    Sevilleja, JEAD
    Macalalag, MEL
    Habana, AE
    Macalalag, EV
    RESEARCH PAPERS IN FERTILITY AND REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 1271 : 403 - 406
  • [25] A physical model for dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry-derived bone mineral density
    Sievänen, H
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2000, 35 (05) : 325 - 330
  • [26] Bone mineral measurement of phalanges: Comparison of radiographic absorptiometry and area dual X-ray absorptiometry
    Gulam, M
    Thornton, MM
    Hodsman, AB
    Holdsworth, DW
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (02) : 586 - 591
  • [27] In vivo differences among scan modes in bone mineral density measurement at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
    Bandirali, Michele
    Sconfienza, Luca M.
    Aliprandi, Alberto
    Di Leo, Giovanni
    Marchelli, Daniele
    Ulivieri, Fabio M.
    Sardanelli, Francesco
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2014, 119 (04): : 257 - 260
  • [28] Anomalies in the measurement of changes in bone mineral density of the spine by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
    Tothill, P
    Avenell, A
    CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 63 (02) : 126 - 133
  • [29] The Effect of Abdominal Anatomy on the Measurement of Bone Mineral Density With Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
    Basaloglu, Can
    Gungor, Ozlem
    Balci, Ali
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2021, 45 (03) : 458 - 462
  • [30] Bone mineral and soft tissue measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry during growth
    Tothill, P
    Hannan, WJ
    BONE, 2002, 31 (04) : 492 - 496