Critical Appraisal of Mixed Methods Studies

被引:90
|
作者
Heyvaert, Mieke [1 ]
Hannes, Karin [1 ]
Maes, Bea [1 ]
Onghena, Patrick [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
关键词
research synthesis; mixed methods research; systematic review; quality assessment; critical appraisal; quality evaluation; FRAMEWORK; VALIDITY; DEFINITION; PREVALENCE; VALIDATION; PRAGMATISM; EDUCATION; CRITERIA; QUALITY; INQUIRY;
D O I
10.1177/1558689813479449
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In several subdomains of the social, behavioral, health, and human sciences, research questions are increasingly answered through mixed methods studies, combining qualitative and quantitative evidence and research elements. Accordingly, the importance of including those primary mixed methods research articles in systematic reviews grows. It is generally known that the critical appraisal of articles is an essential step in the development of a methodologically sound review. This article provides an overview of the available critical appraisal frameworks developed to evaluate primary mixed methods research articles. In addition, we critically compare and evaluate these frameworks and the quality criteria they include.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 327
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条