Clinical decision analysis in perinatology

被引:21
作者
D'Souza, Rohan [1 ,2 ]
Shah, Prakesh S. [2 ,3 ]
Sander, Beate [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Div Maternal & Fetal Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Pediat, Div Neonatol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Toronto Hlth Econ & Technol Assessment Collaborat, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Decision analysis; model-based economic evaluation; obstetrics; perinatology; pregnancy; PREGNANT-WOMEN; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; HEALTH; MODEL; ANTICOAGULATION;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.13264
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Clinical decision-making in perinatology involves trade-offs between two intricately related individuals - mother and fetus. Decision-making in perinatology is challenging due to competing interests of the mother and the fetus. Although decision analytic methods are increasingly used to develop processes for clinical and cost-effectiveness analyses in perinatology, there are no guidelines on the conduct and reporting of decision analysis studies that takes into account the complexities of the mother-fetus dyad. This article describes the basics of decision analysis and highlights areas that require special consideration in the perinatal context. It emphasizes the importance of obtaining patient preferences related to combined maternal-fetal health states, stresses the relevance of both maternal and offspring health outcomes over appropriate time horizons, and explains challenges around the use of quality-adjusted life years as an outcome measure in perinatology. It also provides insight into the complexities of dyad status in clinical and cost-effectiveness analyses in perinatology.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 499
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, METHODS EC EVALUATIO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, EUR HEART J, DOI DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr218
[3]  
[Anonymous], 38 ANN N AM M SOC ME
[4]  
[Anonymous], SOC MED DECISIO 1021
[5]   Model Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Analysis: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force Working Group-6 [J].
Briggs, Andrew H. ;
Weinstein, Milton C. ;
Fenwick, Elisabeth A. L. ;
Karnon, Jonathan ;
Sculpher, Mark J. ;
Paltiel, A. David .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2012, 32 (05) :722-732
[6]   Modeling Good Research Practices-Overview: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-1 [J].
Caro, J. Jaime ;
Briggs, Andrew H. ;
Siebert, Uwe ;
Kuntz, Karen M. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2012, 32 (05) :667-677
[7]   Decision Analysis Studies Involving the Management of Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review [J].
D'Souza, Rohan ;
McKelvey, Kyra ;
Murphy, Kellie ;
Sander, Beate .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 :186S-186S
[8]   Anticoagulation for pregnant women with mechanical heart valves: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
D'Souza, Rohan ;
Ostro, Jackie ;
Shah, Prakesh S. ;
Silversides, Candice K. ;
Malinowski, Ann ;
Murphy, Kellie E. ;
Sermer, Mathew ;
Shehata, Nadine .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2017, 38 (19) :1509-1516
[9]   Optimal Anticoagulation for Pregnant Women with Mechanical Heart Valves [J].
D'Souza, Rohan ;
Silversides, Candice K. ;
McLintock, Claire .
SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 2016, 42 (07) :798-804
[10]  
Dowie J, 1996, J Health Serv Res Policy, V1, P104