The time course of semantic and syntactic processing in reading Chinese: Evidence from ERPs

被引:15
作者
Wang, Suiping [1 ]
Mo, Deyuan [1 ]
Xiang, Ming [2 ]
Xu, Ruiping [1 ]
Chen, Hsuan-Chih [3 ]
机构
[1] S China Normal Univ, Dept Psychol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Linguist, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Psychol, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES | 2013年 / 28卷 / 04期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Semantic processing; Syntactic processing; ERPs; N400; P600; BRAIN POTENTIALS; SENTENCE COMPREHENSION; NEURAL MECHANISMS; EYE-MOVEMENTS; LANGUAGE; RESPONSES; NOUNS; VERBS; EXPECTANCY; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1080/01690965.2012.660169
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The time course of semantic and syntactic processing in reading Chinese was examined by recording event-related brain potentials (ERPs) as native Chinese speakers read individually presented sentences for comprehension and performed semantic plausibility judgments. The transitivity of the verbs in Chinese ba/bei constructions was manipulated to form three types of stimuli: Congruent sentences (CON), sentences with semantic violation (SEM), and sentences with combined semantic and syntactic violation (SEM+SYN). Compared with the critical words in CON, those in SEM and SEM+SYN elicited an N400-P600 biphasic pattern. The N400 effects in both violation conditions were of similar size and distribution, but the P600 in SEM+SYN was bigger than that in SEM. Overall, the lack of a difference between SEM and SEM+SYN in the earlier time window (i.e., N400 window) suggested that syntactic processing in Chinese does not necessarily occur earlier than semantic processing.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 596
页数:20
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Dissociating brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies: Evidence from event-related potentials [J].
Ainsworth-Darnell, K ;
Shulman, HG ;
Boland, JE .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1998, 38 (01) :112-130
[2]   Cortical brain responses to semantic incongruity and syntactic violation in Italian language: an event-related potential study [J].
Angrilli, A ;
Penolazzi, B ;
Vespignani, F ;
De Vincenzi, M ;
Job, R ;
Ciccarelli, L ;
Palomba, D ;
Stegagno, L .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2002, 322 (01) :5-8
[3]  
[Anonymous], PROCESS LANGUAGE UND
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Handbook of Psycholinguistics
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Modern Chinese Word Frequency Dictionary.
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1995, CHINESE TEACHING WOR
[7]   Psycholinguistics: A cross-language perspective [J].
Bates, E ;
Devescovi, A ;
Wulfeck, B .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 52 :369-396
[8]   The relationship between syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension [J].
Boland, JE .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1997, 12 (04) :423-484
[9]   Think globally: Cross-linguistic variation in electrophysiological activity during sentence comprehension [J].
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina ;
Kretzschmar, Franziska ;
Tune, Sarah ;
Wang, Luming ;
Genc, Safiye ;
Philipp, Markus ;
Roehm, Dietmar ;
Schlesewsky, Matthias .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2011, 117 (03) :133-152
[10]   An alternative perspective on "semantic P600" effects in language comprehension [J].
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina ;
Schlesewsky, Matthias .
BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2008, 59 (01) :55-73