The Impact of Brexit on the European Parliament Political Groups

被引:2
作者
Babynina, L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Europe RAS, Ctr Polit Integrat Studies, 11-3 Mokhovaya St, Moscow 125009, Russia
[2] Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, Fac World Polit, Moscow, Russia
来源
CONTEMPORARY EUROPE-SOVREMENNAYA EVROPA | 2019年 / 05期
关键词
Brexit; European Parliament election; European Union; United Kingdom; European Parliament political groups; eurosceptics;
D O I
10.15211/soveurope520196877
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
The article deals with the results of the European Parliament elections in the United Kingdom, the distribution of British deputies within the European Parliament (EP) political groups and the possible consequences for the shaped fraction structure which might arise as a result of their withdrawal from the EP. The author comes to the conclusion that the results of the 2016 referendum and the 2019 European elections in the United Kingdom are quantitatively and geographically very similar, and the UK is still split into proLeave and pro-Remain regions. The parties with a clear position on the EU membership such as eurosceptic "Brexit" party and pro-European Liberal Democrats, gained the largest number of votes. Having internal contradictions on the European issue Conservative and Labour parties showed the worst results for the last hundred years. The presence of the British MPs in the European Parliament had an impact on the formation of pan-European political groups, especially the associations of eurosceptics. Despite the fact that the right-wing populists managed to form a large group "Identity and democracy", they have not increased its influence on the work of Parliament due to the fact that "Brexit" party remained outside the political groups of the EP. It is pro-European liberals and greens (not Eurosceptics) who will be mainly affected by the British EMP withdrawal. Nevertheless, after the United Kingdom leaves the EU, pro-European parties will keep majority, and the existing balance of power in the European Parliament will remain.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 77
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Ananeva E. V., 2017, KONTURY GLOBALNYH TR, V10, P98
  • [2] BABYNINA L, 2018, SOVREMENNAYA EVROPA, P57, DOI DOI 10.15211/SOVEUROPE420185767
  • [3] Britain and the world after Brexit
    Blagden, David
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL POLITICS, 2017, 54 (01) : 1 - 25
  • [4] Bolin N., 2019, 40 DEMICOM
  • [5] Negotiating Brexit: the European Parliament between participation and influence
    Bressanelli, Edoardo
    Chelotti, Nicola
    Lehmann, Wilhelm
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, 2019, 41 (03) : 347 - 363
  • [6] Brown H., 2017, International Politics Reviews, V5, P1, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1057/s41312-017-0023-7, DOI 10.1057/S41312-017-0023-7]
  • [7] Brexit, the UK and Europe: Why, how and what next?
    Brown, Stuart A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, 2019, 41 (01) : 123 - 129
  • [8] Cutts D., 2019, POLITICAL QIUART AUG, P1
  • [9] Euroscepticism and the European Elections
    de Quant, Sebastian
    [J]. SURVIVAL, 2019, 61 (02) : 111 - 118
  • [10] Fromage D, 2019, PERSPECTIVES FEDERAL, V11, P94