Yield and Water Use of Siberian Wildrye with Ridge and Furrow Planting in Northern China

被引:8
作者
Zhang, W. [1 ]
Li, Z. [1 ]
Gong, Y. [1 ]
Lu, X. [1 ]
Nielsen, D. C. [2 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Dep Soil & Water Sci, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] ARS, USDA, Cent Great Plains Res Stn, Akron, CO 80720 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
SOIL-WATER; CROP PRODUCTION; USE EFFICIENCY; IRRIGATION; POTATO; MULCH; TEMPERATURE; TILLAGE; HARVEST; L;
D O I
10.2134/agronj2012.0469
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Siberian wildrye (Elymus sibiricus L.) is a perennial grass that is widely planted in semiarid northern China, but yield is often low due to insufficient soil water supply. Field experiments were conducted from 2009 to 2011 to study the effects of ridge and furrow planting (RFP) on yield, evapotranspiration, and water use efficiency (WUE) of Siberian wildrye grassland under rainfed conditions. The treatments included bare flat bed planting (FB), bare ridge with bare furrow (BRB), bare ridge with naked oat (Avena nuda L.) straw mulch in furrow (BRM), plastic mulch on ridge with bare furrow (MRB), and plastic mulch on ridge with straw mulch in furrow (MRM). In the RFP system, the ridge and furrow were each 30 cm wide. Total forage yield with MRB and MRM each year was 46 to 111% and 50 to 135% greater, respectively, than with FB (2580 kg ha(-1) yr(-1)). These two treatments also increased total WUE each year by 79 to 121% and 80 to 150%, respectively, compared with FB (10.8 kg ha(-1) mm(-1) yr(-1)). The BRB and BRM treatments increased total forage yield by 47 and 81% and total WUE by 51 and 81%, respectively, compared with FB only in 2010. The addition of straw mulch did not result in a further increase in total yield or WUE. Therefore, the MRB planting system will be recommended in Siberian wildrye production for achieving relatively high forage yield and WUE.
引用
收藏
页码:1787 / 1796
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
[2]   Soil water recharge under uncropped ridges and furrows [J].
Bargar, B ;
Swan, JB ;
Jaynes, D .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1999, 63 (05) :1290-1299
[3]   MICRO-CATCHMENT-WATER-HARVESTING (MCWH) FOR ARID ZONE DEVELOPMENT [J].
BOERS, TM ;
ZONDERVAN, K ;
BENASHER, J .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 1986, 12 (1-2) :21-39
[4]   Mulch effects on rainfall interception, soil physical characteristics and temperature under Zea mays L. [J].
Cook, Hadrian F. ;
Valdes, Gerardo S. B. ;
Lee, Howard C. .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2006, 91 (1-2) :227-235
[5]  
CRITCHLEY W., 1991, A manual for the design and construction of water harvesting schemes for plant production
[6]   The effect of mulching and tillage on the water and temperature regimes of a loess soil: Experimental findings and modeling [J].
Dahiya, Rita ;
Ingwersen, Joachim ;
Streck, Thilo .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2007, 96 (1-2) :52-63
[7]   Interactions between litter and water availability affect seedling emergence in four familial pairs of floodplain species [J].
Eckstein, RL ;
Donath, TW .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2005, 93 (04) :807-816
[8]   Effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization on biomass yield and efficiency of energy use in crop production of Miscanthus [J].
Ercoli, L ;
Mariotti, M ;
Masoni, A ;
Bonari, E .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1999, 63 (01) :3-11
[9]   Tillage, mulch and irrigation effects on corn (Zea mays L) in relation to evaporative demand [J].
Gill, KS ;
Gajri, PR ;
Chaudhary, MR ;
Singh, B .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 1996, 39 (3-4) :213-227
[10]   Micro-variability of hydrological processes at the maize row scale: implications for soil water content measurements and evapotranspiration estimates [J].
Hupet, F ;
Vanclooster, A .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2005, 303 (1-4) :247-270