Eliciting preferences on secondary findings: the Preferences Instrument for Genomic Secondary Results

被引:27
作者
Brothers, Kyle B. [1 ,2 ]
East, Kelly M. [3 ]
Kelley, Whitley V. [3 ]
Wright, M. Frances [4 ]
Westbrook, Matthew J. [5 ,6 ]
Rich, Carla A. [1 ]
Bowling, Kevin M. [3 ]
Lose, Edward J. [7 ]
Bebin, E. Martina [8 ]
Simmons, Shirley [8 ]
Myers, John A. [1 ]
Barsh, Greg [3 ,9 ]
Myers, Richard M. [3 ]
Cooper, Greg M. [3 ]
Pulley, Jill M. [10 ]
Rothstein, Mark A. [2 ]
Clayton, Ellen Wright [11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[2] Univ Louisville, Inst Bioeth Hlth Policy & Law, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[3] HudsonAlpha Inst Biotechnol, Huntsville, AL USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[5] St Louis Univ, Sch Law, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
[6] St Louis Univ, Coll Publ Hlth & Social Justice, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
[7] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Genet, Birmingham, AL USA
[8] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Neurol, Birmingham, AL USA
[9] Stanford Univ, Dept Genet, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[10] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Res Support Serv, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[11] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Biomed Ethics & Soc, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
关键词
clinical tools; genomic secondary results; incidental findings; preferences; whole genome sequencing; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; CLINICAL EXOME; RETURN;
D O I
10.1038/gim.2016.110
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose: Eliciting and understanding patient and research participant preferences regarding return of secondary test results are key aspects of genomic medicine. A valid instrument should be easily understood without extensive pretest counseling while still faithfully eliciting patients' preferences. Methods: We conducted focus groups with 110 adults to understand patient perspectives on secondary genomic findings and the role that preferences should play. We then developed and refined a draft instrument and used it to elicit preferences from parents participating in a genomic sequencing study in children with intellectual disabilities. Results: Patients preferred filtering of secondary genomic results to avoid information overload and to avoid learning what the future holds, among other reasons. Patients preferred to make autonomous choices about which categories of results to receive and to have their choices applied automatically before results are returned to them and their clinicians. The Preferences Instrument for Genomic Secondary Results (PIGSR) is designed to be completed by patients or research participants without assistance and to guide bioinformatic analysis of genomic raw data. Most participants wanted to receive all secondary results, but a significant minority indicated other preferences. Conclusions: Our novel instrument-PIGSR-should be useful in a wide variety of clinical and research settings.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 344
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Annas GJ, 2014, NEW ENGL J MED, V370, P2248, DOI [10.1056/NEJMp1316367, 10.1056/NEJMc1404692]
[2]   The Development of a Preference-Setting Model for the Return of Individual Genomic Research Results [J].
Bacon, Phoebe L. ;
Harris, Erin D. ;
Ziniel, Sonja I. ;
Savage, Sarah K. ;
Weitzman, Elissa R. ;
Green, Robert C. ;
Huntington, Noelle L. ;
Holm, Ingrid A. .
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2015, 10 (02) :107-120
[3]  
Berg JS, 2013, GENET MED, V15, P860, DOI 10.1038/gim.2013.133
[4]   An informatics approach to analyzing the incidentalome [J].
Berg, Jonathan S. ;
Adams, Michael ;
Nassar, Nassib ;
Bizon, Chris ;
Lee, Kristy ;
Schmitt, Charles P. ;
Wilhelmsen, Kirk C. ;
Evans, James P. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 15 (01) :36-44
[5]  
Christensen KD, 2013, PERS MED, V10, P377, DOI [10.2217/pme.13.24, 10.2217/PME.13.24]
[6]   Return of individual research results from genome-wide association studies: experience of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network [J].
Fullerton, Stephanie M. ;
Wolf, Wendy A. ;
Brothers, Kyle B. ;
Clayton, Ellen Wright ;
Crawford, Dana C. ;
Denny, Joshua C. ;
Greenland, Philip ;
Koenig, Barbara A. ;
Leppig, Kathleen A. ;
Lindor, Noralane M. ;
McCarty, Catherine A. ;
McGuire, Amy L. ;
Hinz, Eugenia R. McPeek ;
Mirel, Daniel B. ;
Ramos, Erin M. ;
Ritchie, Marylyn D. ;
Smith, Maureen E. ;
Waudby, Carol J. ;
Burke, Wylie ;
Jarvik, Gail P. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 14 (04) :424-431
[7]  
Garrett JR., 2014, 2014 ANN M AM SOC BI
[8]   ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing [J].
Green, Robert C. ;
Berg, Jonathan S. ;
Grody, Wayne W. ;
Kalia, Sarah S. ;
Korf, Bruce R. ;
Martin, Christa L. ;
McGuire, Amy L. ;
Nussbaum, Robert L. ;
O'Daniel, Julianne M. ;
Ormond, Kelly E. ;
Rehm, Heidi L. ;
Watson, Michael S. ;
Williams, Marc S. ;
Biesecker, Leslie G. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 15 (07) :565-574
[10]   ResearchMatch: A National Registry to Recruit Volunteers for Clinical Research [J].
Harris, Paul A. ;
Scott, Kirstin W. ;
Lebo, Laurie ;
Hassan, NikNik ;
Lightner, Chad ;
Pulley, Jill .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2012, 87 (01) :66-73