Think Outside: Advancing Risk and Protective Factor Research Beyond the Intimate-Partner-Violence Box

被引:7
作者
Sullivan, Tami P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
关键词
risk factor; protective factor; partner violence; women's victimization; research design; SOCIAL SUPPORT; MENTAL-HEALTH; VICTIMIZATION; ABUSE;
D O I
10.1037/a0032125
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objectives: Thinking outside the metaphorical box of extant research on any topic, including intimate partner violence (IPV), has the potential to move a field forward exponentially. Therefore, this commentary aims to stimulate thinking about IPV research specifically related to women's IPV victimization in 2 ways: first, by highlighting selected foci of existing research that may limit the field, and second, by proposing greater foci on topics and approaches less explored that hold promise to generate knowledge with strong implications to improve the well-being of individuals, families, and communities, including: studies of protective factors, which may be modifiable with intervention; psychological IPV and an understanding of the co-occurrence of IPV types; multidisciplinary collaborative research that includes community partners; and constructs yet to be measured/explored. Conclusions: Moving toward a comprehensive approach to research that includes examination of both risk and protective factors - particularly those that are modifiable with intervention - will enable us to identify critical factors and begin developing better interventions for improving the lives of so many impacted by IPV. To accomplish the aforementioned, some of us may need to go outside of our comfort zones, and in many cases outside of our disciplines, to conduct research that has the greatest impact. As a field, we are up for the challenge given the tremendous benefits to be gained.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 125
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Arias I, 1999, Violence Vict, V14, P55
  • [2] Does batterers' treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment
    Babcock, JC
    Green, CE
    Robie, C
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2004, 23 (08) : 1023 - 1053
  • [3] The process through which an advocacy intervention resulted in positive change for battered women over time
    Bybee, DI
    Sullivan, CM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 30 (01) : 103 - 132
  • [4] Canady B.E., 2009, Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment Trauma, V18, P443, DOI [DOI 10.1080/10926770903051009, 10.1080/10926770903051009]
  • [5] A Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence
    Capaldi, Deborah M.
    Knoble, Naomi B.
    Shortt, Joann Wu
    Kim, Hyoun K.
    [J]. PARTNER ABUSE, 2012, 3 (02): : 231 - 280
  • [6] Intimate partner abuse and mental health - The role of Social Support and other protective factors
    Carlson, BE
    McNutt, LA
    Choi, DY
    Rose, IM
    [J]. VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN, 2002, 8 (06) : 720 - 745
  • [7] Social support reduces the impact of partner violence on health: application of structural equation models
    Coker, AL
    Watkins, KW
    Smith, PH
    Brandt, HM
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 37 (03) : 259 - 267
  • [8] Frequency and correlates of intimate partner violence by type: Physical, sexual, and psychological battering
    Coker, AL
    Smith, PH
    McKeown, RE
    King, MJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2000, 90 (04) : 553 - 559
  • [9] Coker Ann L, 2005, Violence Vict, V20, P625, DOI 10.1891/vivi.20.6.625
  • [10] Ford JD, 2011, BEHAV THER, V42, P560, DOI 10.1016/j.beth.2010.12.005