Novel Methods to Predict Increased Intracranial Pressure During Intensive Care and Long-Term Neurologic Outcome After Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and Validation in a Multicenter Dataset

被引:82
作者
Guiza, Fabian [1 ]
Depreitere, Bart [2 ]
Piper, Ian [3 ]
Van den Berghe, Greet [1 ]
Meyfroidt, Geert [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Intens Care Med, Louvain, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Neurosurg, Louvain, Belgium
[3] So Gen Hosp, Dept Clin Phys, Glasgow G51 4TF, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
automated; data mining; decision support techniques; forecasting; Glasgow Outcome Scale; intensive care; intracranial hypertension; models; pattern recognition; statistical; traumatic brain injury; SECONDARY INSULTS; HYPERTENSION;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182742d0a
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: Intracranial pressure monitoring is standard of care after severe traumatic brain injury. Episodes of increased intracranial pressure are secondary injuries associated with poor outcome. We developed a model to predict increased intracranial pressure episodes 30 mins in advance, by using the dynamic characteristics of continuous intracranial pressure and mean arterial pressure monitoring. In addition, we hypothesized that performance of current models to predict long-term neurologic outcome could be substantially improved by adding dynamic characteristics of continuous intracranial pressure and mean arterial pressure monitoring during the first 24 hrs in the ICU. Design: Prognostic modeling. Noninterventional, observational, retrospective study. Setting and Patients: The Brain Monitoring with Information Technology dataset consisted of 264 traumatic brain injury patients admitted to 22 neuro-ICUs from 11 European countries. Interventions: None. Measurements: Predictive models were built with multivariate logistic regression and Gaussian processes, a machine learning technique. Predictive attributes were Corticosteroid Randomisation After Significant Head Injury-basic and International Mission for Prognosis and Clinical Trial design in TBI-core predictors, together with time-series summary statistics of minute-by-minute mean arterial pressure and intracranial pressure. Main Results: Increased intracranial pressure episodes could be predicted 30 mins ahead with good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow p value 0.12, calibration slope 1.02, calibration-in-the-large -0.02) and discrimination (area under the receiver operating curve = 0.87) on an external validation dataset. Models for prediction of poor neurologic outcome at six months (Glasgow Outcome Score 1-2) based only on static admission data had 0.72 area under the receiver operating curve; adding dynamic information of intracranial pressure and mean arterial pressure during the first 24 hrs increased performance to 0.90. Similarly, prediction of Glasgow Outcome Score 1-3 was improved from 0.68 to 0.87 when including dynamic information. Conclusion: The dynamic information in continuous mean arterial pressure and intracranial pressure monitoring allows to accurately predict increased intracranial pressure in the neuro-ICU. Adding information of the first 24 hrs of intracranial pressure and mean arterial pressure monitoring to known baseline risk factors allows very accurate prediction of long-term neurologic outcome at 6 months. (Crit Care Med 2013; 41: 554-564)
引用
收藏
页码:554 / 564
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]   Automated Measurement of "Pressure Times Time Dose" of Intracranial Hypertension Best Predicts Outcome After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury [J].
Kahraman, Sibel ;
Dutton, Richard P. ;
Hu, Peter ;
Xiao, Yan ;
Aarabi, Bizhan ;
Stein, Deborah M. ;
Scalea, Thomas M. .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 69 (01) :110-118
[12]   Intracranial pressure variability and long-term outcome following traumatic brain injury [J].
Kirkness, Catherine J. ;
Burr, Robert L. ;
Mitchell, Pamela H. .
INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE AND BRAIN MONITORING XIII: MECHANISMS AND TREATMENT, 2008, 102 :105-108
[13]   Early prognosis in traumatic brain injury: from prophecies to predictions [J].
Lingsma, Hester F. ;
Roozenbeek, Bob ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Murray, Gordon D. ;
Maas, Andrew I. R. .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2010, 9 (05) :543-554
[14]  
Lu J, 2005, ACT NEUR S, V95, P281
[15]   Computerized prediction of intensive care unit discharge after cardiac surgery: development and validation of a Gaussian processes model [J].
Meyfroidt, Geert ;
Guiza, Fabian ;
Cottem, Dominiek ;
De Becker, Wilfried ;
Van Loon, Kristien ;
Aerts, Jean-Marie ;
Berckmans, Daniel ;
Ramon, Jan ;
Bruynooghe, Maurice ;
Van den Berghe, Greet .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2011, 11
[16]   Machine learning techniques to examine large patient databases [J].
Meyfroidt, Geert ;
Guiza, Fabian ;
Ramon, Jan ;
Bruynooghe, Maurice .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH-CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2009, 23 (01) :127-143
[17]   Multivariable prognostic analysis in traumatic brain injury: Results from the IMPACT study [J].
Murray, Gordon D. ;
Butcher, Isabella ;
McHugh, Gillian S. ;
Lu, Juan ;
Mushkudiani, Nino A. ;
Maas, Andrew I. R. ;
Marmarou, Anthony ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2007, 24 (02) :329-337
[18]   The BrainIT group:: concept and core dataset definition [J].
Piper, I ;
Citerio, G ;
Chambers, I ;
Contant, C ;
Enblad, P ;
Fiddes, H ;
Howells, T ;
Kiening, K ;
Nilsson, P ;
Yau, YH .
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2003, 145 (08) :615-629
[19]  
Rasmussen C.E., 2015, DOCUMENTATION GPML M
[20]  
Rasmussen CE, 2005, ADAPT COMPUT MACH LE, P1