Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Conservative Therapy-Refractive Epilepsy and Depression

被引:5
作者
Moebius, H. [1 ,2 ]
Welkoborsky, H. J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] KRH Klinikum Nordstadt, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Haltenhoffstr 41, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
[2] Childrens Hosp Bult, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Hannover, Germany
关键词
Epilepsy; depression; vagus nerve stimulation; responsive vagal nerve stimulation; transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation; quality of life; biomarker; mechanism of action; DRUG-RESISTANT EPILEPSY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; T-WAVE ALTERNANS; AUTONOMIC REGULATION THERAPY; OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP-APNEA; LONG-TERM; VAGAL-STIMULATION; ICTAL TACHYCARDIA; SOLITARY TRACT; HEART-FAILURE;
D O I
10.1055/a-1660-5591
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Numerous studies confirm that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an efficient, indirect neuromodulatory therapy with intermittently applied electrical current used for epilepsy that either cannot be treated by epilepsy surgery or is therapy-refractory. It is effective in drug therapy-refractory depressions as well. VNS is an established, evidence-based and in the long-term cost-effective therapy in an interdisciplinary overall concept. Long-term data on the safety and tolerance of the method are available despite the heterogeneity of the patient populations. Stimulation-related side effects like hoarseness, paresthesia, cough or dyspnea depend on the stimulation strength and often decrease with continuing therapy duration in the following years. Stimulation-related side effects of VNS can be well influenced by modifying the stimulation parameters. Overall, the invasive vagus nerve stimulation may be considered as a safe and well-tolerated therapy option. Antiepileptic and antidepressant as well as positive cognitive effects could be proven using invasive and transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation. In contrast to drugs, VNS has no negative effect on cognition. In many cases, an improvement of the quality of life is possible. iVNS therapy has a low probability of complete seizure-freedom in cases of focal and genetically generalized epilepsy. It must be considered as palliative therapy, which means that it does not lead to healing and requires the continuation of specific medication. The functional principle is a general reduction of the neuronal excitability. This effect is achieved by a slow increase of the effectiveness sometimes over several years. Responders are those patients who experience a 50% reduction of the seizure incidence. Some studies even reveal seizure-freedom in 20 % of the cases. Currently, it is not possible to differentiate between potential responders and non-responders prior to therapy/implantation. The current technical developments of the iVNS generators of the new generation like closed-loop system (cardiac-based seizure detection, CBSD) reduce also the risk for SUDEP (sudden unexpected death in epilepsy patients), a very rare, lethal complication of epilepsies, beside the seizure severity. iVNS may deteriorate an existing sleep apnea syndrome and therefore requires possible therapy interruption during night-time (day-night programming or magnet use) beside the close cooperation with sleep physicians. The evaluation of the numerous iVNS trials of the past two decades showed multiple positive effects on other immunological, cardiological, and gastroenterological diseases so that additional therapy indications may be expected depending on future study results. Currently, the vagus nerve stimulation is in the focus of research in the disciplines of psychology, immunology, cardiology as well as pain and plasticity research with the desired potential of future medical application. Beside invasive vagus nerve stimulation with implantation of an IPG and an electrode, also devices for transdermal and thus non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation have been developed during the last years. According to the data that are currently available, they are less effective with regard to the reduction of the seizure severity and duration in cases of therapy-refractory epilepsy and slightly less effective regarding the improvement of depression symptoms. In this context, studies are missing that confirm high evidence of effectiveness. The same applies to for other indications like tinnitus, cephalgia, gastro-intestinal complaints etc. In contrast to implanted iVNS therapy systems another disadvantage of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation is the stimulator which has to be applied actively by the patients and is not permanently active. So they are only intermittently active; furthermore, the therapy adherence is uncertain.
引用
收藏
页码:S114 / S142
页数:29
相关论文
共 241 条
[1]   A 5-Year Observational Study of Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Treated With Vagus Nerve Stimulation or Treatment as Usual: Comparison of Response, Remission, and Suicidality [J].
Aaronson, Scott T. ;
Sears, Peter ;
Ruvuna, Francis ;
Bunker, Mark ;
Conway, Charles R. ;
Dougherty, Darin D. ;
Reimherr, Frederick W. ;
Schwartz, Thomas L. ;
Zajecka, John M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 174 (07) :640-648
[2]   Long-term results with vagus nerve stimulation in children with pharmacoresistant epilepsy [J].
Alexopoulos, Andreas V. ;
Kotagal, Prakash ;
Loddenkemper, Tobias ;
Hammel, Jeffrey ;
Bingaman, William E. .
SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2006, 15 (07) :491-503
[3]  
Amar Arun Paul, 2007, Expert Rev Neurother, V7, P1763, DOI 10.1586/14737175.7.12.1763
[4]   Epilepsy, vagal nerve stimulation by the NCP system mortality, and sudden, unexpected, unexplained death [J].
Annegers, JF ;
Coan, SP ;
Hauser, WA ;
Leestma, J ;
Duffell, W ;
Tarver, B .
EPILEPSIA, 1998, 39 (02) :206-212
[5]  
[Anonymous], COOKIE EINSTELLUNGEN
[6]  
[Anonymous], EINFLUSS TRANSKUTANE
[7]  
[Anonymous], SAFETY INFORM
[8]  
[Anonymous], AMTLICHER TEIL BUNDE
[9]  
[Anonymous], GAMMACORESAPPHIRE IF
[10]   Cardiac responses of vagus nerve stimulation: Intraoperative bradycardia and subsequent chronic stimulation [J].
Ardesch, J. J. ;
Buschman, H. P. J. ;
van der Burgh, P. H. ;
Wagener-Schimmel, L. J. J. C. ;
van der Aa, H. E. ;
Hageman, G. .
CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2007, 109 (10) :849-852