A checklist to improve reporting of group-based behaviour-change interventions

被引:61
作者
Borek, Aleksandra J. [1 ]
Abraham, Charles [1 ]
Smith, Jane R. [1 ]
Greaves, Colin J. [1 ]
Tarrant, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Sch Med, Psychol Appl Hlth Grp, Exeter EX1 2LU, Devon, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Reporting guidelines; Reporting quality; Group-based interventions; Behaviour change interventions; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY INTERVENTIONS; EDUCATION; QUALITY; TRIALS; RECOMMENDATIONS; GUIDELINES; TAXONOMY; PROTOCOL; PEOPLE; RISK;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-015-2300-6
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Published descriptions of group-based behaviour-change interventions (GB-BCIs) often omit design and delivery features specific to the group setting. This impedes the ability to compare behaviour-change interventions, synthesise evidence on their effectiveness and replicate effective interventions. The aim of this study was to develop a checklist of elements that should be described to ensure adequate reporting of GB-BCIs. Methods: A range of characteristics needed to replicate GB-BCIs were extracted from the literature and precisely defined. An abbreviated checklist and a coder manual were developed, pilot tested and refined. The final checklist and coder manual were used to identify the presence or absence of specified reporting elements in 30 published descriptions of GB-BCIs by two independent coders. Reliability of coding was assessed. Results: The checklist comprises 26 essential reporting elements, covering intervention design, intervention content, participant characteristics, and facilitator characteristics. Inter-rater reliability for identification of reporting elements was high (95 % agreement, Mean AC1 = 0.89). Conclusion: The checklist is a practical tool that can be used, alongside other reporting guidelines, to ensure comprehensive description and to assess reporting quality of GB-BCIs. It can also be helpful for designing group-based health interventions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 68 条
[31]   Structured patient education: the Diabetes X-PERT Programme makes a difference [J].
Deakin, T. A. ;
Cade, J. E. ;
Williams, R. ;
Greenwood, D. C. .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2006, 23 (09) :944-954
[32]   Optimizing acceptability and feasibility of an evidence-based behavioral intervention for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: An open-pilot intervention study in secondary care [J].
Dombrowski, Stephan U. ;
Sniehotta, Falko F. ;
Johnston, Marie ;
Broom, Iain ;
Kulkarni, Utkarsh ;
Brown, Jenny ;
Murray, Lynne ;
Araujo-Soares, Vera .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2012, 87 (01) :108-119
[33]   Identifying active ingredients in complex behavioural interventions for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: a systematic review [J].
Dombrowski, Stephan U. ;
Sniehotta, Falko F. ;
Avenell, Alison ;
Johnston, Marie ;
MacLennan, Graeme ;
Araujo-Soares, Vera .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2012, 6 (01) :7-32
[34]  
Elwyn G., 2001, Groups: A guide to small group work
[35]   A THEORY OF SOCIAL COMPARISON PROCESSES [J].
Festinger, Leon .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1954, 7 (02) :117-140
[36]   What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? [J].
Glasziou, Paul ;
Meats, Emma ;
Heneghan, Carl ;
Shepperd, Sasha .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7659) :1472-1474
[37]  
Greaves CJ, 2007, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V57, P814
[38]   Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions [J].
Greaves, Colin J. ;
Sheppard, Kate E. ;
Abraham, Charles ;
Hardeman, Wendy ;
Roden, Michael ;
Evans, Philip H. ;
Schwarz, Peter .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 11
[39]  
Gwet K., 2002, Stat. Methods Inter-Rater Reliab. Assess. Ser, V2, P9, DOI DOI 10.1007/SPRINGERREFERENCE_183942]
[40]  
Gwet KL., 2012, HDB INTERRATER RELIA