Application of the Red-List Index at a National Level for Multiple Species Groups

被引:24
作者
Juslen, Aino [1 ]
Hyvarinen, Esko [2 ]
Virtanen, Laura K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Finnish Museum Nat Hist, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Metsahallitus, Nat Heritage Serv, FI-40101 Jyvaskyla, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Dept Environm Sci, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
biological diversity indicator; biological diversity loss; Finland; fungi; insects; RLI; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; TRENDS; BIRDS;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.12016
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List Index (RLI) is recognized as one of the key indicators of trends in the status of species. The red-list assessment done by Finnish authorities of species in Finland is taxonomically one of the most extensive national assessments. We used the Finnish Red Lists from 2000 and 2010 to calculate for the first time the national RLIs for 11 taxonomic groups at different trophic levels and with different life cycles. The red-list index is calculated on the basis of changes in red-list categories and indicates trends in the status of biological diversity of sets of species. The RLI value ranges from 0 to 1. The lower the value the faster the set of species is heading toward extinction. If the value is 1, all species in the set are least concern and if the value is 0, all species are (regionally) extinct. The overall RLI of Finnish species decreased. This means that, in Finland, these taxonomic groups were heading toward extinction faster in 2010 than in 2000. Of the analyzed groups of organisms, RLIs of 5 decreased and RLIs of 6 increased. At the national level, the RLIs and status trends varied markedly between species groups. Thus, we concluded that generalizations on the basis of RLIs of a few taxa only may yield a biased view of ongoing trends in the status of biological diversity at the species level. In addition, one overall RLI that includes many different species groups may also be misleading if variation in RLI among species groups is not considered and if RLI values are not presented separately for each group.
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 406
页数:9
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, SUOMEN LAJIEN UHANAL
  • [3] Toward monitoring global biodiversity
    Baillie, Jonathan E. M.
    Collen, Ben
    Amin, Rajan
    Akcakaya, H. Resit
    Butchart, Stuart H. M.
    Brummitt, Neil
    Meagher, Thomas R.
    Ram, Mala
    Hilton-Taylor, Craig
    Mace, Georgina M.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2008, 1 (01): : 18 - 26
  • [4] BirdLife International, 2008, BIRDS SOM REG NOT OC
  • [5] Brummitt Neil, 2008, Endangered Species Research, V6, P127, DOI 10.3354/esr00135
  • [6] Bubb P. J., 2009, IUCN RED LIST INDEXG
  • [7] Using Red List Indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and beyond
    Butchart, SHM
    Stattersfield, AJ
    Baillie, J
    Bennun, LA
    Stuart, SN
    Akçakaya, HR
    Hilton-Taylor, C
    Mace, GM
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 360 (1454) : 255 - 268
  • [8] Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity:: Red list indices for birds
    Butchart, SHM
    Stattersfield, AJ
    Bennun, LA
    Shutes, SM
    Akçakaya, HR
    Baillie, JEM
    Stuart, SN
    Hilton-Taylor, C
    Mace, GM
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2004, 2 (12) : 2294 - 2304
  • [9] Red List Indices to measure the sustainability of species use and impacts of invasive alien species
    Butchart, Stuart H. M.
    [J]. BIRD CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 18 : S245 - S262
  • [10] Improvements to the Red List Index
    Butchart, Stuart H. M.
    Akcakaya, H. Resit
    Chanson, Janice
    Baillie, Jonathan E. M.
    Collen, Ben
    Quader, Suhel
    Turner, Will R.
    Amin, Rajan
    Stuart, Simon N.
    Hilton-Taylor, Craig
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2007, 2 (01):