The use of geographic information systems to map and assess ecosystem services

被引:85
作者
Nemec, Kristine T. [1 ]
Raudsepp-Hearne, Ciara [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Sch Nat Resources, Nebraska Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
GIS; Decision making; Ecosystem services; Geographic information systems; Mapping; Modeling; OF-THE-ART; CONSERVATION; TRADEOFFS; VALUATION; BIODIVERSITY; SCALES;
D O I
10.1007/s10531-012-0406-z
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
In recent years, geographic information systems (GIS) have become a powerful tool for mapping and assessing the provision of ecosystem services within a landscape. GIS can help land managers and conservationists visualize spatial and temporal patterns and changes in ecosystem services and estimate the potential impact from projected changes in land use or management or climatic conditions on the provision of these services. The end-goal of ecosystem service assessment is usually to estimate marginal values of ecosystem services to inform decisions where trade-offs in ecosystem service provision will affect human well-being. Because our ability to estimate the provision of ecosystem services underlies our ability to estimate their societal values, the theoretical bases of GIS approaches and models for assessing ecosystem services need to be well understood before they are employed for decision-making purposes. This paper reviews GIS approaches and software developed for the assessment of ecosystem services and highlights their strengths and weaknesses in the context of different end uses.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:15
相关论文
共 61 条
[21]   The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services [J].
Eigenbrod, Felix ;
Armsworth, Paul R. ;
Anderson, Barbara J. ;
Heinemeyer, Andreas ;
Gillings, Simon ;
Roy, David B. ;
Thomas, Chris D. ;
Gaston, Kevin J. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2010, 47 (02) :377-385
[22]   ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND ECONOMIC THEORY: INTEGRATION FOR POLICY-RELEVANT RESEARCH [J].
Fisher, Brendan ;
Turner, Kerry ;
Zylstra, Matthew ;
Brouwer, Roy ;
de Groot, Rudolf ;
Farber, Stephen ;
Ferraro, Paul ;
Green, Rhys ;
Hadley, David ;
Harlow, Julian ;
Jefferiss, Paul ;
Kirkby, Chris ;
Morling, Paul ;
Mowatt, Shaun ;
Naidoo, Robin ;
Paavola, Jouni ;
Strassburg, Bernardo ;
Yu, Doug ;
Balmford, Andrew .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2008, 18 (08) :2050-2067
[23]   Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services [J].
Hein, Lars ;
van Koppen, Kris ;
de Groot, Rudolf S. ;
van Ierland, Ekko C. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 57 (02) :209-228
[24]   Function and "functioning" in ecology: what does it mean? [J].
Jax, K .
OIKOS, 2005, 111 (03) :641-648
[25]   Valuing indirect ecosystem services: the case of tropical watersheds [J].
Kaiser, B ;
Roumasset, J .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2002, 7 :701-714
[26]  
Kareiva P, 2011, NATURAL CAPITAL: THEORY & PRACTICE OF MAPPING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, P1, DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588992.001.0001
[27]   Determining when payments are an effective policy approach to ecosystem service provision [J].
Kemkes, Robin J. ;
Farley, Joshua ;
Koliba, Christopher J. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (11) :2069-2074
[28]  
Leopold A., 1970, S COUNTY ALMANAC
[29]   Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities [J].
Naidoo, R. ;
Balmford, A. ;
Costanza, R. ;
Fisher, B. ;
Green, R. E. ;
Lehner, B. ;
Malcolm, T. R. ;
Ricketts, T. H. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (28) :9495-9500
[30]  
Natural Capital Project, 2011, INVEST INT VAL EC SE