Expectations for agents with goal-driven autonomy

被引:0
作者
Dannenhauer, Dustin [1 ]
Munoz-Avila, Hector [2 ]
Cox, Michael T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Navatek LLC, Arlington, VA 22203 USA
[2] Lehigh Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
[3] Wright State Univ, Wright State Res Inst, Dayton, OH 45435 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Goal-driven autonomy; agent's expectations; goal reasoning; COMPLEXITY; STRIPS;
D O I
10.1080/0952813X.2020.1789755
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Goal-driven autonomy is an agent model for managing a dynamic environment by reasoning about current and potential goals while planning and acting. Since unexpected events and conditions may cause an agent's goals and plans to become invalid or infeasible, an agent with goal-driven autonomy should monitor the environment against its expectations. Designed for dynamic, open, and partially observable environments, such an agent can create new goals or change its existing goals as needed. We present a formalisation of expectations for agents operating in these kinds of environments. Our formalisation includes situations where agents have the capability to sense the environment with some associated costs. We examine agent choices and behaviour in these domains and evaluate multiple approaches for selecting a subset of the agent's sensing actions to execute. The contributions of this work are (1) a specification of different approaches to generating expectations; (2) a formalisation of the autonomy problem that minimises sensing costs; (3) a complexity analysis of the problem; (4) new algorithms for deciding which sensing actions to perform; and (5) empirical results demonstrating the benefit and cost of these approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:867 / 889
页数:23
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Ayan N., 2007, PLANNING PLAN EXECUT
[2]  
Benson S., 1993, MACH INTELL, V14,29-62, DOI [10.5555/242040.242045, DOI 10.5555/242040.242045]
[3]   Belief Tracking for Planning with Sensing: Width, Complexity and Approximations [J].
Bonet, Blai ;
Geffner, Hector .
JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2014, 50 :923-970
[4]  
Bouguerra A., 2007, ICAPS WORKSH PLANN P
[5]  
Brenner M., 2006, P 2006 INT S PRACT C, P15, DOI [10.1145/1232425.1232431, DOI 10.1145/1232425.1232431]
[6]   THE COMPUTATIONAL-COMPLEXITY OF PROPOSITIONAL STRIPS PLANNING [J].
BYLANDER, T .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1994, 69 (1-2) :165-204
[7]  
Cashmore M., 2019, P INT C AUTOMATED PL, DOI DOI 10.1609/ICAPS.V29I1.3534
[8]   Evolution of the ICARUS Cognitive Architecture [J].
Choi, Dongkyu ;
Langley, Pat .
COGNITIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2018, 48 :25-38
[9]   Reactive goal management in a cognitive architecture [J].
Choi, Dongkyu .
COGNITIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2011, 12 (3-4) :293-308
[10]  
Choudhury S., 2020, ARXIV200309746