Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators

被引:206
作者
Carter, FJ [1 ]
Schijven, MP
Aggarwal, R
Grantcharov, T
Francis, NK
Hanna, GB
Jakimowicz, JJ
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Ninewells Hosp, Cuschieri Skills Ctr, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
[2] IJsselland Hosp, Dept Surg, NL-2906 ZC Ijssel, Netherlands
[3] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci & Technol, Dept Surg Oncol & Technol, London W2 1NY, England
[4] Glostrup Cty Hosp, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Ninewells Hosp, TUHT, Directorate Surg, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
[6] Catharina Hosp, Dept Surg, NL-5602 ZA Eindhoven, Netherlands
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2005年 / 19卷 / 12期
关键词
virtual reality; surgical training; validation; simulation; consensus guidelines;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-005-0384-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The Work Group for Evaluation and Implementation of Simulators and Skills Training Programmes is a newly formed subgroup of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES). This work group undertook a review of validation evidence for surgical simulators and the resulting consensus is presented in this article. Using clinical guidelines criteria, the evidence for validation for six different simulators was rated and subsequently translated to a level of recommendation for each system. The simulators could be divided into two basic types; systems for laparoscopic general surgery and flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy. Selection of simulators for inclusion in this consensus was based on their availability and relatively widespread usage as of July 2004. Whilst level 2 recommendations were achieved for a few systems, it was clear that there was an overall lack of published validation studies with rigorous experimental methodology. Since the consensus meeting, there have been a number of new articles, system upgrades and new devices available. The work group intends to update these consensus guidelines on a regular basis, with the resulting article available on the EAES website (http://www.eaes-eur.org).
引用
收藏
页码:1523 / 1532
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[11]  
DUFFY AJ, 2003, SURG ENDOSC S, V17, pS230
[12]   Visuospatial skills and computer game experience influence the performance of virtual endoscopy [J].
Enochsson, L ;
Isaksson, B ;
Tour, R ;
Kjellin, A ;
Hedman, L ;
Wredmark, T ;
Tsai-Felländer, L .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2004, 8 (07) :876-882
[13]  
FANELLI RD, 2003, P SAGES M 12 15 MARC, pP233
[14]   Evaluation of a virtual endoscopy simulator for training in gastrointestinal endoscopy [J].
Ferlitsch, A ;
Glauninger, P ;
Gupper, A ;
Schillinger, M ;
Haefner, M ;
Gangl, A ;
Schoefl, R .
ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 34 (09) :698-702
[15]   CONSENSUS METHODS - CHARACTERISTICS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE [J].
FINK, A ;
KOSECOFF, J ;
CHASSIN, M ;
BROOK, RH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1984, 74 (09) :979-983
[16]  
Fry H., 1999, HDB TEACHING LEARNIN
[17]   Discriminative validity of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer in Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) using criteria levels based on expert performance [J].
Gallagher, AG ;
Lederman, AB ;
McGlade, K ;
Satava, RM ;
Smith, CD .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (04) :660-665
[18]   Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills - Learning curves and reliability measures [J].
Gallagher, AG ;
Satava, RM .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (12) :1746-1752
[19]   Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced, junior, and novice laparoscopists with virtual reality [J].
Gallagher, AG ;
Richie, K ;
McClure, N ;
McGuigan, J .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 25 (11) :1478-1483
[20]   Spatial awareness in urologists: are they different? [J].
Gallagher, HJ ;
Allan, JD ;
Tolley, DA .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 88 (07) :666-670