Mapping wastes in complex projects for Lean Product Development

被引:19
作者
Belvedere, Valeria [1 ]
Cuttaia, Francesco [2 ]
Rossi, Monica [3 ]
Stringhetti, Luca [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, I-20123 Milan, Italy
[2] INAF, Osservatorio Astrofis & Sci Spazio, Via Gobetti 101, I-40129 Bologna, Italy
[3] Politecn Milan, Via Lambruschini 4-b, I-20156 Milan, Italy
[4] Jodrell Bank, SKA Sq Kilometre Array Org, Macclesfield, Cheshire, England
[5] IASF Milano, INAF, Via Corti 12, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
Lean product development; Complex projects; Project performance; Waste; Astrophysics; Survey; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; RISK-MANAGEMENT; SUCCESS; FMEA; MODEL; UNCERTAINTY; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.008
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Lean Product Development (LPD) is suggested as an approach that can reduce waste in projects aimed at developing technically complex items, which typically present substantial uncertainty about their output, as well as higher costs and longer development times. However, how can LPD be implemented in complex projects, where some redundancies in the development process are considered necessary in order to guarantee the quality of the final outcome? This paper answers this question, through a survey conducted at INAF, the Italian Institute of Astrophysics, that runs complex projects. The evidence shows that complex projects can actually be affected by the types of waste reported in LPD literature. Still, researchers may fail to determine the real priorities of intervention as they have trouble distinguishing between value-adding and value-destroying activities. Furthermore, they do not perceive the relevance of addressing the wastes generated by their own work; on the contrary, they place considerable attention on inefficiencies that are beyond the scope of their direct responsibilities. Recommendations to overcome this problem are proposed. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd, APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 424
页数:15
相关论文
共 76 条
[11]   Can Innovation Be Lean? [J].
Browning, Tyson R. ;
Sanders, Nada R. .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2012, 54 (04) :5-19
[12]   Reconceptualizing the effects of lean on production costs with evidence from the F-22 program [J].
Browning, Tyson R. ;
Heath, Ralph D. .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2009, 27 (01) :23-44
[13]  
Carbone T.A., 2004, ENG MANAG J, V16, P28, DOI DOI 10.1080/10429247.2004.11415263
[14]   FMEA: A model for reducing medical errors [J].
Chiozza, Maria Laura ;
Ponzetti, Clemente .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2009, 404 (01) :75-78
[15]   Combining service blueprint and FMEA for service design [J].
Chuang, Pao-Tiao .
SERVICE INDUSTRIES JOURNAL, 2007, 27 (1-2) :91-104
[16]  
CLARK KB, 1987, BROOKINGS PAP ECO AC, P729
[17]  
Cooke-Davies T., 2007, PROJ MANAG J, V38, P50, DOI DOI 10.1177/875697280703800206
[18]   Complexity, uncertainty and mental models: From a paradigm of regulation to a paradigm of emergence in project management [J].
Daniel, Pierre A. ;
Daniel, Carole .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2018, 36 (01) :184-197
[20]   Managing complex projects in the infrastructure sector - A structural equation model for flexibility-focused project management [J].
Eriksson, Per Erik ;
Larsson, Johan ;
Pesamaa, Ossi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2017, 35 (08) :1512-1523