Mapping wastes in complex projects for Lean Product Development

被引:19
作者
Belvedere, Valeria [1 ]
Cuttaia, Francesco [2 ]
Rossi, Monica [3 ]
Stringhetti, Luca [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, I-20123 Milan, Italy
[2] INAF, Osservatorio Astrofis & Sci Spazio, Via Gobetti 101, I-40129 Bologna, Italy
[3] Politecn Milan, Via Lambruschini 4-b, I-20156 Milan, Italy
[4] Jodrell Bank, SKA Sq Kilometre Array Org, Macclesfield, Cheshire, England
[5] IASF Milano, INAF, Via Corti 12, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
Lean product development; Complex projects; Project performance; Waste; Astrophysics; Survey; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; RISK-MANAGEMENT; SUCCESS; FMEA; MODEL; UNCERTAINTY; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.008
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Lean Product Development (LPD) is suggested as an approach that can reduce waste in projects aimed at developing technically complex items, which typically present substantial uncertainty about their output, as well as higher costs and longer development times. However, how can LPD be implemented in complex projects, where some redundancies in the development process are considered necessary in order to guarantee the quality of the final outcome? This paper answers this question, through a survey conducted at INAF, the Italian Institute of Astrophysics, that runs complex projects. The evidence shows that complex projects can actually be affected by the types of waste reported in LPD literature. Still, researchers may fail to determine the real priorities of intervention as they have trouble distinguishing between value-adding and value-destroying activities. Furthermore, they do not perceive the relevance of addressing the wastes generated by their own work; on the contrary, they place considerable attention on inefficiencies that are beyond the scope of their direct responsibilities. Recommendations to overcome this problem are proposed. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd, APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 424
页数:15
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Complex project management as complex problem solving: A distributed knowledge management perspective [J].
Ahern, Terence ;
Leavy, Brian ;
Byrne, P. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2014, 32 (08) :1371-1381
[2]   Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for wind turbines [J].
Arabian-Hoseynabadi, H. ;
Oraee, H. ;
Tavner, P. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2010, 32 (07) :817-824
[3]  
Baccarini D., 1996, International Journal of Project Management, V14, P201, DOI 10.1016/0263-7863(95)00093-3
[4]  
Bandecchi M., 2000, P EUSEC, V9, P2000
[5]  
Baujard M., 2010, EXPERIENCE REPORT TH
[6]   Can Lean Systems Engineering enhance the value of astrophysical projects? [J].
Belvedere, Valeria ;
Stringhetti, Luca .
HUMAN SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 2014, 33 (03) :99-111
[7]   THE TELESCOPE THAT ATE ASTRONOMY [J].
Billings, Lee .
NATURE, 2010, 467 (7319) :1028-1030
[8]   Project complexity and team-level absorptive capacity as drivers of project management performance [J].
Bjorvatn, Torbjorn ;
Wald, Andreas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2018, 36 (06) :876-888
[9]   Adding value in product development by creating information and reducing risk [J].
Browning, TR ;
Deyst, JJ ;
Eppinger, SD ;
Whitney, DE .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2002, 49 (04) :443-458
[10]   Managing complex project process models with a process architecture framework [J].
Browning, Tyson R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2014, 32 (02) :229-241