A comparison of the ultrasound-guided modified-thoracolumbar interfascial plane block and wound infiltration for postoperative pain management in lumbar spinal surgery patients

被引:10
|
作者
Ekinci, Mursel [1 ]
Ciftci, Bahadir [1 ]
Celik, Erkan Cem [2 ]
Yayik, Ahmet Murat [2 ]
Tahta, Alican [3 ]
Atalay, Yunus Oktay [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Medipol Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Mega Medipol Univ Hosp, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Erzurum Reg Training & Res Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Erzurum, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Medipol Univ, Mega Medipol Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Lumbar spinal surgery; modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block; postoperative analgesia; wound infiltration; TLIP BLOCK; BACK-PAIN; BUPIVACAINE; LAMINECTOMY; ANALGESIA; EFFICACY; LEVOBUPIVACAINE; CLOSURE;
D O I
10.14744/agri.2019.97759
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Pain management is an important issue following lumbar spinal surgery. Wound infiltration is a technique that a local anesthetic solution is infiltrated into the tissues around the surgical area. Previous studies reported that US-guided modified thoracolumbar interfacial plane (mTLIP) block after lumbar spinal surgery provided effective analgesia. In this study, we aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of the US-guided mTLIP block and wound infiltration following lumbar disc surgery. Methods: 60 patients aged 18-65 years, ASA classification I-II, and scheduled for lumbar disc surgery under general anesthesia were included in the study. US-guided mTLIP block was performed via the lateral approach in group T (n=30), and wound infiltration was performed in group W (n=30). Opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores and adverse effects of opioids, such as allergic reactions, nausea, and vomiting, were recorded. Results: Opioid consumption and the use of rescue analgesia were significantly lower in group T in all the postoperative periods (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 h) (p<0.05). The VAS scores for pain during mobility and while at rest were significantly lower in group T than those in group W 8 h after the surgery (p<0.05). The incidences of nausea, vomiting, and itching in group W were higher than the incidences in group T. Conclusion: The mTLIP block provides effective analgesia for the first 24 h following lumbar disc surgery, and it may be an alternative to wound infiltration for pain management.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 146
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison between ultrasound-guided interfascial pulsed radiofrequency and ultrasound-guided interfascial block with local anesthetic in myofascial pain syndrome of trapezius muscle
    Cho, Ik Tae
    Cho, Yun Woo
    Kwak, Sang Gyu
    Chang, Min Cheol
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (05)
  • [42] Ultrasound guided Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane (TLIP) block with and without Dexamethasone: A Comparative study in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries
    Tarigonda, Sumanth
    Papireddy, Sujatha Munireddy
    Senthamarai, Shrieaswari
    Voleti, Vishnuvardhan
    Srinivasa, Manohar
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2021, 133 (3S_SUPPL): : 139 - 139
  • [43] Analgesic efficacy of classical thoracolumbar interfascial plane block versus modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block in patients undergoing lumbar disc surgeries: A comparative, randomised controlled trial
    Mondal, Sourav
    Pandey, Ravinder Kumar
    Kumar, Mritunjay
    Sharma, Ankur
    Darlong, Vanlal
    Punj, Jyotsna
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 68 (04) : 366 - 373
  • [44] Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of the Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Decompression Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study
    Yayik, Ahmet Murat
    Cesur, Sevim
    Ozturk, Figen
    Ahiskalioglu, Ali
    Ay, Ayse Nur
    Celik, Erkan Cem
    Karaavci, Nuh Cagri
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 126 : E779 - E785
  • [45] Analgesic efficacy of two different volumes of local anaesthetics in ultrasound-guided modified approach to the thoracolumbar interfascial plane block in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries: a randomized controlled trial
    Abdelhamid, Bassant Mohamed
    Ayman, Eslam
    Nabil, Tareq
    Hamimy, Waleed Ibrahim
    Morsy, Mohamed Abd El-Monem
    ANAESTHESIOLOGY INTENSIVE THERAPY, 2023, 55 (05) : 358 - 365
  • [46] Reply to the comments on the "Comparison of efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus thoracolumbar interfascial plane block in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries: A systematic review and trial sequential meta-analysis"
    Majage, Siddhavivek
    Ravikumar, Rajathadri Hosur
    Prasanna, Mrudula
    Chandramouli, M.
    Datta, Priyankar Kumar
    Baidya, Dalim Kumar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2025, 69 (04) : 422 - 423
  • [47] Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Thoracolumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Viderman, Dmitriy
    Aubakirova, Mina
    Umbetzhanov, Yerlan
    Kulkaeva, Gulnara
    Shalekenov, S. B.
    Abdildin, Yerkin G.
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [48] Postoperative quality of recovery with erector spinae plane block or thoracolumbar interfascial plane block after major spinal surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    Ayşegül Bilge
    Betül Başaran
    European Spine Journal, 2024, 33 : 68 - 76
  • [49] Evaluation of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block for postoperative analgesia after herniated lumbar disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial
    Ammar, Mona Ahmed
    Taeimah, Mohamed
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 12 (04) : 559 - 564
  • [50] Posterior Quadratus Lumborum Block or Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block and Postoperative Analgesia after Spinal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Adiguzel, Senay Canikli
    Akyurt, Dilan
    Altun, Hatice Bahadir
    Ozgen, Gokce Ultan
    Akdeniz, Sevda
    Bayraktar, Birol
    Tulgar, Serkan
    Yigit, Yavuz
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (23)