Comparison of two wave element methods for the Helmholtz problem

被引:67
作者
Huttunen, T. [1 ]
Gamallo, P. [2 ]
Astley, R. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kuopio, Dept Phys, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[2] Univ Vigo, Dept Deseno Enxeneria, Vigo 36310, Spain
[3] Univ Southampton, Inst Sound & Vibrat Res, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
来源
COMMUNICATIONS IN NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING | 2009年 / 25卷 / 01期
关键词
Helmholtz problem; partition of unity; ultra-weak variational formulation; WEAK VARIATIONAL FORMULATION; FINITE-ELEMENTS; DIFFRACTION PROBLEMS; PLANE-WAVES; PARTITION; SCATTERING;
D O I
10.1002/cnm.1102
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In comparison with low-order finite element methods (FEMs), the use of oscillatory basis functions has been shown to reduce the computational complexity associated with the numerical approximation of Helmholtz problems at high wave numbers. We compare two different wave element methods for the 2D Helmholtz problems. The methods chosen for this study are the partition Of unity FEM (PUFEM) and the ultra-weak variational formulation (UWVF). In both methods, the local approximation of wave field is computed using a set of plane waves for constructing the basis functions. However, the methods are based on different variational formulations; the PUFEM basis also includes a polynomial component, whereas the UWVF basis consists purely of plane waves. As model problems we investigate propagating and evanescent wave modes in a duct with rigid walls and singular eigenmodes in an L-shaped domain. Results show a good performance of both methods for the modes in the duct, but only a satisfactory accuracy was obtained in the case of the singular field. On the other hand, both the methods can suffer from the ill-conditioning of the resulting matrix system. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 52
页数:18
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Special short wave elements for flow acoustics [J].
Astley, RJ ;
Gamallo, P .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2005, 194 (2-5) :341-353
[2]  
Atkins H.L., 1997, AIAA Paper 97-1581
[3]  
Babuska I, 1997, INT J NUMER METH ENG, V40, P727, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19970228)40:4<727::AID-NME86>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-N
[5]   Error estimates in the fast multipole method for scattering problems - Part 1: Truncation of the Jacobi-Anger series [J].
Carayol, Q ;
Collino, F .
ESAIM-MATHEMATICAL MODELLING AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS-MODELISATION MATHEMATIQUE ET ANALYSE NUMERIQUE, 2004, 38 (02) :371-394
[6]   Using plane waves as base functions for solving time harmonic equations with the ultra weak variational formulation [J].
Cessenat, O ;
Després, B .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL ACOUSTICS, 2003, 11 (02) :227-238
[7]   Application of an ultra weak variational formulation of elliptic PDEs to the two-dimensional Helmholtz problem [J].
Cessenat, O ;
Despres, B .
SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 1998, 35 (01) :255-299
[8]  
CESSENAT O, 1996, THESIS PARIS 9
[9]  
DESPRES B, 1994, CR ACAD SCI I-MATH, V318, P939
[10]   A discontinuous Galerkin method with Lagrange multipliers for the solution of Helmholtz problems in the mid-frequency regime [J].
Farhat, C ;
Harari, I ;
Hetmaniuk, U .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2003, 192 (11-12) :1389-1419