Wound image evaluation with machine learning

被引:50
作者
Veredas, Francisco J. [1 ]
Luque-Baena, Rafael M. [2 ]
Martin-Santos, Francisco J. [3 ]
Morilla-Herrera, Juan C. [3 ]
Morente, Laura [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaga, Dept Lenguajes & Ciencias Comp, E-29071 Malaga, Spain
[2] Univ Extremadura, Ctr Univ Merida, Dept Ingn Sist Informat & Telemat, Merida 00680, Spain
[3] Junta Andalucia, Serv Andaluz Salud, Malaga 29001, Spain
[4] Diputac Malaga, Escuela Univ Enfermeria, Malaga 29071, Spain
关键词
Machine vision; Medical imaging; Computer-aided diagnosis; Wound evaluation; PRESSURE ULCER; CLASSIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.neucom.2014.12.091
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A pressure ulcer is a clinical pathology of localized damage to the skin and underlying tissue caused by pressure, shear or friction. Diagnosis, care and treatment of pressure ulcers can result in extremely expensive costs for health systems. A reliable diagnosis supported by precise wound evaluation is crucial in order to succeed on the treatment decision and, in some cases, to save the patient's life. However, current clinical evaluation procedures, focused mainly on visual inspection, do not seem to be accurate enough to accomplish this important task. This paper presents a computer-vision approach based on image processing algorithms and supervised learning techniques to help detect and classify wound tissue types that play an important role in wound diagnosis. The system proposed involves the use of the k-means clustering algorithm for image segmentation and compares three different machine learning approaches neural networks, support vector machines and random forest decision trees to classify effectively each segmented region as the appropriate tissue type. Feature selection based on a wrapper approach with recursive feature elimination is shown to be effective in keeping the efficacy of the classifiers up and significantly reducing the number of necessary predictors. Results obtained show high performance rates from classifiers based on fitted neural networks, random forest models and support vector machines (overall accuracy on a testing set [95% Cl], respectively: 81.87% [80.03%, 83.61%]; 87.37% [85.76%, 88.86%]; 88.08% [86.51%, 89.53%]), with significant differences found between the three machine learning approaches. This study seeks to provide, using standard classification algorithms, a consistent and robust methodological framework as a basis for the development of reliable computational systems to support ulcer diagnosis. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 122
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   The use of "overall accuracy" to evaluate the validity of screening or diagnostic tests [J].
Alberg, AJ ;
Park, JW ;
Hager, BW ;
Brock, MV ;
Diener-West, M .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 19 (05) :460-465
[2]   STATISTICS NOTES - DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS-1 - SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY .3. [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6943) :1552-1552
[3]   DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS-2 - PREDICTIVE VALUES .4. [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6947) :102-102
[4]   Selection bias in gene extraction on the basis of microarray gene-expression data [J].
Ambroise, C ;
McLachlan, GJ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (10) :6562-6566
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, EPUAP Review, V1, P31
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1994, MACHINE LEARNING P 1, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-1-55860-335-6.50023-4
[7]   EPUAP classification system for pressure ulcers:: European reliability study [J].
Beeckman, Dimitri ;
Schoonhoven, Lisette ;
Fletcher, Jacqui ;
Furtado, Katia ;
Gunningberg, Lena ;
Heyman, Hilde ;
Lindholm, Christina ;
Paquay, Louis ;
Verdu, Jose ;
Defloor, Tom .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2007, 60 (06) :682-691
[8]  
Belem B., 2004, THESIS U GLAMORGAN
[9]  
Bergmeir C, 2012, J STAT SOFTW, V46, P1
[10]  
BERRIS P, 2000, THESIS U READING UK