Use of observed temperature statistics in ranking CMIP5 model performance over the Western Himalayan Region of India

被引:24
作者
Das, Lalu [1 ]
Dutta, Monami [1 ]
Mezghani, Abdelkader [2 ]
Benestad, Rasmus E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Dept Agr Meteorol & Phys, Nadia 741252, W Bengal, India
[2] Norwegian Meteorol Inst, Div Model & Climate Anal, Oslo, Norway
关键词
MICE; CMIP5; GCMs; ERA-interim; seasonal cycle; spatial correlation; trends; CLIMATE-CHANGE; NORTHWESTERN HIMALAYA; MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE; CHANGE SCENARIOS; TRENDS; PROJECTIONS; MINIMUM; REGRESSION; GLACIERS;
D O I
10.1002/joc.5193
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Assessing warming over the Western Himalayan Region (WHR) of India is challenging due to its limited station data availability and poor data quality. The missing values in the station data were replaced using the Multiple Imputation Chained Equation technique. Finally, 16 stations having continuous records during 1969-2009 were considered as the reference stations' for assessing the warming/cooling trends in addition to evaluate the Coupled Model Intercomparison, phase 5 (CMIP5), Global Circulation Model (GCM). Station data indicates winter (DJF) warming is higher and rapid (1.41 degrees C) than the other seasons and less warming was observed in the post-monsoon (0.31 degrees C) season. Overall mean annual warming over WHR is approximate to 0.84 degrees C during 1969-2009. The performance of 34 CMIP5 models was evaluated based on three different criteria namely (1) mean seasonal cycle, (2) temporal trends and (3) spatial correlation between simulated and observed signals for common available period of 1969-2003 over the study area. Models are provided a final rank on the basis of the cumulative rank obtained in each of three approaches. CMCC-CM, GISS-E2-H and MIROC 5 are three top-ranked models while MIROC-ESM, MIROC-ESM-CHEM and bcc-csm1-1 are three bottom-ranked models over the WHR. The study also extended to judge whether the selected top-ranked models perform well through two alternative data sources namely European Reanalysis (ERA)-interim and Climate Research Unit (CRU), which have not used in the process of model evaluation. The spatial patterns of top-ranked GCM are similar to the spatial pattern obtained through ERA-interim and CRU while zoomed in to WHR but bottom-ranked models fail to reproduce such spatial patterns indicating the top-ranked GCMs would offer more reliability for projecting future climate over WHR.
引用
收藏
页码:554 / 570
页数:17
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 79 WMO
[2]  
[Anonymous], J R STAT SOC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Third Assessment Report: Climate Change 2001 TAR, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1058-2746(02)86826-4
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1966, WMO Tech. Note 79
[5]  
[Anonymous], METEOROL APPL
[6]  
[Anonymous], AM MET SOC 11 C WEAT
[7]  
[Anonymous], 21 INT C MOD SIM GOL
[8]  
[Anonymous], J CLIMATE
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1998, PLATEAU METEOROLOGY
[10]  
[Anonymous], AM MET SOC 6 C MOUNT