Seismic induced damageability evaluation of steel buildings: a Fuzzy-TOPSIS method

被引:15
作者
Shahriar, Anjuman [1 ]
Modirzadeh, Mehdi [1 ]
Sadiq, Rehan [1 ]
Tesfamariam, Solomon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Okanagan Sch Engn, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
关键词
seismic evaluation; Fuzzy-TOPSIS; hierarchical structure; linguistic variables; Fuzzy sets; damageability; multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM); ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING; NUMBERS; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.12989/eas.2012.3.5.695
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Seismic resiliency of new buildings has improved over the years due to better seismic codes and design practices. However, there is still large number of vulnerable and seismically deficient buildings. It is not economically feasible to retrofit and upgrade all vulnerable buildings, thus there is a need for rapid screening tool. Many factors contribute to the damageability of buildings; this makes seismic evaluation a complex multi-criteria decision making problem. Many of these factors are non-commensurable and involve subjectivity in evaluation that highlights the use of fuzzy-based method. In this paper, a risk-based framework earlier proposed by Tesfamariam and Saatcioglu (2008a) is extended using Fuzzy-TOPSIS method and applied to develop an evaluation and ranking scheme for steel buildings. The ranking is based on damageability that can help decision makers interpret the results and take appropriate decision actions. Finally, the application of conceptual model is demonstrated through a case study of 1994 Northridge earthquake data on seismic damage of steel buildings.
引用
收藏
页码:695 / 717
页数:23
相关论文
共 51 条
[21]   Facility location selection using fuzzy TOPSIS under group decisions [J].
Chu, TC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2002, 10 (06) :687-701
[22]   Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines [J].
Cornell, CA ;
Jalayer, F ;
Hamburger, RO ;
Foutch, DA .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 128 (04) :526-533
[23]  
FEMA, 1997, FEMA 273
[24]   Seismic response of steel frames under repeated earthquake [J].
Fragiacomo, M ;
Amadio, C ;
Macorini, L .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2004, 26 (13) :2021-2035
[25]   A RULE-BASED FUZZY-LOGIC DEDUCTION TECHNIQUE FOR DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF PROTECTIVE STRUCTURES [J].
HADIPRIONO, FC ;
ROSS, TJ .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1991, 44 (03) :459-468
[26]  
Hwang Ching-Lai, 1981, MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE D, P58
[27]  
Kaufmann A., 1988, Fuzzy mathematical models in engineering and management science
[28]   EVENT-TREE ANALYSIS BY FUZZY PROBABILITY [J].
KENARANGUI, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 1991, 40 (01) :120-124
[29]  
Klir G, 1995, FUZZY SETS FUZZY LOG, V4
[30]   COMPARISON OF FUZZY NUMBERS BASED ON THE PROBABILITY MEASURE OF FUZZY EVENTS [J].
LEE, ES ;
LI, RJ .
COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 1988, 15 (10) :887-896