A Simple Unified Approach for Estimating Natural Direct and Indirect Effects

被引:330
作者
Lange, Theis [1 ]
Vansteelandt, Stijn [1 ]
Bekaert, Maarten [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Biostat, DK-1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark
关键词
causal inference; marginal structural models; mediation; MARGINAL STRUCTURAL MODELS; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; MEDIATION ANALYSIS; INFERENCE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1093/aje/kwr525
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
An important problem within both epidemiology and many social sciences is to break down the effect of a given treatment into different causal pathways and to quantify the importance of each pathway. Formal mediation analysis based on counterfactuals is a key tool when addressing this problem. During the last decade, the theoretical framework for mediation analysis has been greatly extended to enable the use of arbitrary statistical models for outcome and mediator. However, the researcher attempting to use these techniques in practice will often find implementation a daunting task, as it tends to require special statistical programming. In this paper, the authors introduce a simple procedure based on marginal structural models that directly parameterize the natural direct and indirect effects of interest. It tends to produce more parsimonious results than current techniques, greatly simplifies testing for the presence of a direct or an indirect effect, and has the advantage that it can be conducted in standard software. However, its simplicity comes at the price of relying on correct specification of models for the distribution of mediator (and exposure) and accepting some loss of precision compared with more complex methods. Web Appendixes 1 and 2, which are posted on the Journals Web site (http://aje.oupjournals.org/), contain implementation examples in SAS software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina) and R language (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 195
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], R363 U CAL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CAUSALITY MODELS REA
[3]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[4]   Explaining the social gradient in long-term sickness absence:: a prospective study of Danish employees [J].
Christensen, Karl Bang ;
Labriola, Merete ;
Lund, Thomas ;
Kivimaki, Mika .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2008, 62 (02) :181-183
[5]   Fallibility in estimating direct effects [J].
Cole, SR ;
Hernán, MA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 31 (01) :163-165
[6]   Confounding of Indirect Effects: A Sensitivity Analysis Exploring the Range of Bias Due to a Cause Common to Both the Mediator and the Outcome [J].
Hafeman, Danella M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 174 (06) :710-717
[7]   Opening the Black Box: a motivation for the assessment of mediation [J].
Hafeman, Danella M. ;
Schwartz, Sharon .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 38 (03) :838-845
[8]  
Hong G., 2010, P AM STAT ASS BIOM S, P2401
[9]   A General Approach to Causal Mediation Analysis [J].
Imai, Kosuke ;
Keele, Luke ;
Tingley, Dustin .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2010, 15 (04) :309-334
[10]   Identification, Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects [J].
Imai, Kosuke ;
Keele, Luke ;
Yamamoto, Teppei .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 25 (01) :51-71