Mental number line disruption in a right-neglect patient after a left-hemisphere stroke

被引:34
作者
Pia, Lorenzo [1 ,2 ]
Corazzini, Luca Latini [1 ,2 ]
Folegatti, Alessia [1 ]
Gindri, Patrizia [3 ]
Cauda, Franco [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Dipartimento Psicol, I-10123 Turin, Italy
[2] Ctr Interdipartimentale Avanzati Neurosci NIT, Turin, Italy
[3] Presidio Sanitario San Camillo, Turin, Italy
[4] Ctr Clin Sperimentale Risonanza Magent Funz, Turin, Italy
关键词
Right-neglect; Left hemisphere damage; parietal lobe; Representational neglect; Line bisection; Mental number line; Number-related processes in the parietal lobes; UNILATERAL NEGLECT; SPATIAL NEGLECT; PARIETAL RTMS; BRAIN-DAMAGE; SPACE; REPRESENTATION; BISECTION; BIASES; SEQUENCES; ATTENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.bandc.2008.05.007
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
A right neglect patient with focal left hemisphere damage to the posterior Superior parietal lobe was assessed for numerical knowledge and tested on the bisection of numerical intervals and visual lines. The semantic and verbal knowledge of numbers was preserved, whereas file performance in numerical tasks that strongly emphasize the visuo-spatial layout of numbers (e.g. number bisection) was impaired. The behavioral pattern of error in the two bisection tasks mirrored the one previously described in left-neglect patients. In other words, our patient misplaced the subjective midpoint (numerical or visual) to the left as function of the interval size. These data, paired with the patient's lesion site are strictly consistent with the tripartite organization of number-related processes in the parietal lobes as proposed by Dehaene and colleagues. According to these authors, the posterior superior parietal lobe on both hemispheres underpins the attentional orientation on the putative mental number line, the horizontal segment of the intraparietal sulcus is bilaterally related to the semantic of the numerical domain, whereas the left angular gyrus subserves the verbal knowledge of numbers. In summary, our results suggest that the processes involved in the navigation along the mental number line, which are related to the parietal mechanisms for spatial attention, and the processes involved in the semantic and verbal knowledge of numbers, are dissociable. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 88
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   SIMPLE TEST OF VISUAL NEGLECT [J].
ALBERT, ML .
NEUROLOGY, 1973, 23 (06) :658-664
[2]   FEATURE ARTICLE - Left unilateral neglect as a disconnection syndrome [J].
Bartolomeo, Paolo ;
Thiebaut De Schotten, Michel ;
Doricchi, Fabrizio .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2007, 17 (11) :2479-2490
[3]   NEGLECT DYSGRAPHIA [J].
BAXTER, DM ;
WARRINGTON, EK .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1983, 46 (12) :1073-1078
[4]   Right spatial neglect after left hemisphere stroke - Qualitative and quantitative study [J].
Beis, JM ;
Keller, C ;
Morin, N ;
Bartolomeo, P ;
Bernati, T ;
Chokron, S ;
Leclercq, M ;
Louis-Dreyfus, A ;
Marchal, F ;
Martin, Y ;
Perennou, D ;
Pradat-Diehl, P ;
Prairial, C ;
Rode, G ;
Rousseaux, M ;
Samuel, C ;
Sieroff, E ;
Wiart, L ;
Azouvi, P .
NEUROLOGY, 2004, 63 (09) :1600-1605
[5]  
BISIACH E, 1978, CORTEX, V14, P129, DOI 10.1016/S0010-9452(78)80016-1
[6]   The middle house or the middle floor: Bisecting horizontal and vertical mental number lines in neglect [J].
Cappelletti, Marinella ;
Freeman, Elliot D. ;
Cipolotti, Lisa .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2007, 45 (13) :2989-3000
[7]   Statistical methods for single-case studies in neuropsychology: Comparing the slope of a patient's regression line with those of a control sample [J].
Crawford, JR ;
Garthwaite, PH .
CORTEX, 2004, 40 (03) :533-548
[8]   Comparing an individual's test score against norms derived from small samples [J].
Crawford, JR ;
Howell, DC .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 1998, 12 (04) :482-486
[9]   Three parietal circuits for number processing [J].
Dehaene, S ;
Piazza, M ;
Pinel, P ;
Cohen, L .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 20 (3-6) :487-506
[10]   Arithmetic and the brain [J].
Dehaene, S ;
Molko, N ;
Cohen, L ;
Wilson, AJ .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (02) :218-224