Delay-compensating strategy to enhance string stability of adaptive cruise controlled vehicles

被引:101
作者
Wang, M. [1 ,2 ]
Hoogendoorn, S. P. [1 ]
Daamen, W. [1 ]
van Arem, B. [1 ]
Shyrokau, B. [2 ]
Happee, R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Transport & Planning, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Dept BioMech Engn, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Adaptive cruise control; string stability; system delay; model predictive control; anticipatory control; MODEL-PREDICTIVE CONTROL; ROLLING HORIZON CONTROL; CONTROL-SYSTEMS; FRAMEWORK; DYNAMICS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1080/21680566.2016.1266973
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
A novel strategy to enhance string stability of autonomous vehicles with sensor delay and actuator lag is proposed based on a model predictive control framework. To compensate sensor delay, the approach entails estimating the (unknown) system state at the current time using the system state in a previous time, the applied control history and a system dynamics model. The actuator lag is compensated by including the lag in the state prediction model. The mathematical framework shows that without the anticipation strategy, sensor delay leads to a worse estimate of the initial condition for the optimal control problem and actuator lag increases the mismatch between the system state prediction model and the actual system behaviour. Simulation verified that sensor delay and actuator lag degrade string stability of platoons. The proposed anticipatory control strategy shows clear benefits in improving autonomous vehicle string stability and hence has potential to enhance traffic flow stability.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 229
页数:19
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, MATH PROBL ENG, DOI DOI 10.1109/ISFEE.2014.7050562
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Traffic flow dynamics: Data, models and simulation
[4]   Development and testing of a fully Adaptive Cruise Control system [J].
Bifulco, Gennaro Nicola ;
Pariota, Luigi ;
Simonelli, Fulvio ;
Di Pace, Roberta .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2013, 29 :156-170
[5]  
CHANG PH, 1995, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1995 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, P1638
[6]   EVALUATING HEADWAY CONTROL USING RANGE VERSUS RANGE-RATE RELATIONSHIPS [J].
FANCHER, P ;
BAREKET, Z .
VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 1994, 23 (08) :575-596
[7]  
Findeisen R., 2004, PROC INT S ADV CONTR, P427
[8]   Model Predictive Control Tuning Methods: A Review [J].
Garriga, Jorge L. ;
Soroush, Masoud .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2010, 49 (08) :3505-3515
[9]   Dynamics of connected vehicle systems with delayed acceleration feedback [J].
Ge, Jin I. ;
Orosz, Gabor .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2014, 46 :46-64
[10]  
Godbole D.N., 1999, TRANSPORT RES REC, V1679, P148, DOI DOI 10.3141/1679-20