Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures with modular stems

被引:13
作者
Hernandez-Vaquero, Daniel [1 ]
Fernandez-Lombardia, Jesus [1 ]
Llorens de los Rios, Jimena [1 ]
Perez-Coto, Ivan [1 ]
Iglesias-Fernandez, Susana [1 ]
机构
[1] San Agustin Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Aviles, Spain
关键词
Total hip arthroplasty; Periprosthetic fracture; Modular stem; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; REVISION HIP; RISK-FACTORS; CLASSIFICATION; FAILURE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-015-2958-5
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this study was to analyse the efficacy of modular femoral stems for the treatment of certain post-operative periprosthetic fractures in patients with hip arthroplasty. Methods Of a total series of 61 modular revision stems, 17 were used to address periprosthetic femoral fractures and 12 of these are the object of this study. The average follow-up was 3.7 years (range 1-14 years). The evaluations were performed at three and six months, and then annually using the HHS score and radiographic studies for the assessment of loosening, subsidence and bone integration of the stem. Results Seven cases had type B2 fractures and five type B3 ones. All patients walked freely, eight of them using canes. HHS improved to a post-operative mean of 78 (range 72-83). Radiographically, fracture healing was observed at three months in nine cases. In six cases stem subsidence of a mean of 3.9 mm (range 2-12 mm) was observed, which stabilized a year following implantation and did not need revision surgery. In two cases a subsequent dislocation (at three and seven months after surgery) occurred, which were treated with constrained acetabular systems. In nine cases hypotrophy of the cortex in the diaphyseal area was noted, which did not alter the patients' clinical course. Conclusion Modular femoral stems are an acceptable treatment in type B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures.
引用
收藏
页码:1933 / 1938
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   The Outcome of Modified Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in Revision THA for Vancouver B2/B3 Periprosthetic Fractures of the Femur [J].
Drexler, Michael ;
Dwyer, Tim ;
Chakravertty, Rajesh ;
Backstein, David ;
Gross, Allan E. ;
Safir, Oleg .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (08) :1598-1604
[2]   The Unified Classification System (UCS): improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures [J].
Duncan, C. P. ;
Haddad, F. S. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2014, 96B (06) :713-716
[3]  
Duncan CP, 1995, AAOS INSTR COURS LEC, V44, P293
[4]   Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular Revision Hip System in Cases of Severe Bone Loss [J].
Dzaja, Ivan ;
Lyons, Matt C. ;
McCalden, Richard W. ;
Naudie, Douglas D. D. ;
Howard, James L. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (08) :1594-1597
[5]   Mid-Term Results of 121 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Increased Failure and Mortality Within but not After One Postoperative Year [J].
Fuechtmeier, Bernd ;
Galler, Michael ;
Mueller, Franz .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (04) :669-674
[6]  
Hartman Curtis W, 2012, Instr Course Lect, V61, P313
[7]  
Holt Graeme, 2011, Orthopedics, V34, P11, DOI 10.3928/01477447-20101123-02
[8]   Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 [J].
Kurtz, Steven ;
Ong, Kevin ;
Lau, Edmund ;
Mowat, Fionna ;
Halpern, Michael .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (04) :780-785
[9]   Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Porous-coated Modular Stem: 5 to 10 Years Followup [J].
Lakstein, Dror ;
Backstein, David ;
Safir, Oleg ;
Kosashvili, Yona ;
Gross, Allan E. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (05) :1310-1315
[10]   The management of periprosthetic fractures around the femoral stem [J].
Learmonth, ID .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (01) :13-19