State effectiveness, property rights and entrepreneurial behaviour as determinants of National Innovation

被引:5
作者
Idrees, Alvina Sabah [1 ]
Sarwar, Saima [1 ]
机构
[1] GC Univ Lahore, Dept Econ, Lahore, Pakistan
关键词
economic development; innovation; technological change; and growth; entrepreneurship; Intellectual Property Rights; General; research and development; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; PANEL-DATA; BUSINESS; PATENTS; INSTITUTIONS; PERFORMANCE; INTEGRATION; EMPLOYMENT; COUNTRIES;
D O I
10.1111/1467-8454.12210
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article examines the role of entrepreneurial behaviour, property rights and state effectiveness as determinants of national innovation. Entrepreneurial behaviour reflects not only risk-bearing and risk-sharing attitudes but also the capacity to undertake innovation activities. Besides, institutions also play an important role in formalising entrepreneurial behaviour that is crucial for a country's innovation. A comparison is made among three groups of countries-that is, factor-driven, efficiency-driven and innovation-driven economies. Panel-data econometric techniques are applied to undertake empirical analysis, using macro-level data covering a time period of 7 years (2010-2016). It is observed that entrepreneurial attitudes and entrepreneurial activities play an important role in determining innovation but the impact varies with the level of economic development. A U-shaped relationship is observed between innovation and entrepreneurial activities. Innovation-driven economies have strong property rights and effective policy implementation that help build the confidence of prospective entrepreneurs who are attracted by perceived opportunities. Therefore, perceived opportunities have a significant impact only in innovation-driven economies. Moreover, innovation is highly suppressed in fragile countries, that is, factor-driven economies that face serious market distortions and inefficiencies caused by weak property rights and state ineffectiveness. However, no significant relationship is found in efficiency-driven economies.
引用
收藏
页码:392 / 423
页数:32
相关论文
共 143 条
[1]   Unbundling institutions [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Johnson, S .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2005, 113 (05) :949-995
[2]   Experimentation, Patents, and Innovation [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Bimpikis, Kostas ;
Ozdaglar, Asuman .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MICROECONOMICS, 2011, 3 (01) :37-77
[3]  
ACS ZJ, 1988, AM ECON REV, V78, P678
[4]   Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions [J].
Acs, Zoltan J. ;
Desai, Sameeksha ;
Hessels, Jolanda .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2008, 31 (03) :219-234
[5]   Patents, knowledge spillovers, and entrepreneurship [J].
Acs, Zoltan J. ;
Sanders, Mark .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2012, 39 (04) :801-817
[6]   The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship [J].
Acs, Zoltan J. ;
Audretsch, David B. ;
Lehmann, Erik E. .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2013, 41 (04) :757-774
[7]  
Aidis R., 2017, IZA WORLD LABOR, V2017, P334
[8]  
Aldrich H., 1999, ORG EVOLVING
[9]  
Amaghouss J., 2013, International Business Research, V6, P153, DOI [10.5539/ibr.v6n1p153, DOI 10.5539/IBR.V6N1P153]
[10]   THE INDIVIDUAL INVENTOR AND THE ROLE OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP - A SURVEY OF THE CANADIAN EVIDENCE [J].
AMESSE, F ;
DESRANLEAU, C ;
ETEMAD, H ;
FORTIER, Y ;
SEGUINDULUDE, L .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1991, 20 (01) :13-27