MULTICRITERIA OPTIMIZATION IN INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY TREATMENT PLANNING FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED CANCER OF THE PANCREATIC HEAD

被引:69
|
作者
Hong, Theodore S. [1 ,2 ]
Craft, David L. [1 ,2 ]
Carlsson, Fredrik [3 ]
Bortfeld, Thomas R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] RaySearch Labs, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2008年 / 72卷 / 04期
关键词
Pancreatic cancer; Multicriteria optimization; IMRT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.07.015
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) affords the potential to decrease radiation therapy-associated toxicity by creating highly conformal dose distributions. However, the inverse planning process can create a suboptimal plan despite meeting all constraints. Multicriteria optimization (MCO) may reduce the time-consuming iteration loop necessary to develop a satisfactory plan while providing information regarding trade-offs between different treatment planning goals. In this exploratory study, we examine the feasibility and utility of MCO in physician plan selection in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Methods and Materials: The first 10 consecutive patients with LAPC treated with IMRT were evaluated. A database of plans (Pareto surface) was created that met the inverse planning goals. The physician then navigated to an "optimal" plan from the point on the Pareto surface at which kidney dose was minimized. Results: Pareto surfaces were created for all 10 patients. A physician was able to select a plan from the Pareto surface within 10 minutes for all cases. Compared with the original (treated) IMRT plans, the plan selected from the Pareto surface had a lower stomach mean dose in 9 of 10 patients, although often at the expense of higher kidney dose than with the treated plan. Conclusion: The MCO is feasible in patients with LAPC and allows the physician to choose a satisfactory plan quickly. Generally, when given the opportunity, the physician will choose a plan with a lower stomach dose. The MCO enables a physician to provide greater active clinical input into the IMRT planning process. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1208 / 1214
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stereotactic body radiation therapy planning with duodenal sparing using Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A dosimetric analysis
    Kumar, Rachit
    Wild, Aaron T.
    Ziegler, Mark A.
    Hooker, Ted K.
    Dah, Samson D.
    Tran, Phuoc T.
    Kang, Jun
    Smith, Koren
    Zeng, Jing
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    Tryggestad, Erik
    Ford, Eric
    Herman, Joseph M.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2013, 38 (03) : 243 - 250
  • [2] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer
    Eisbruch, A
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY, 2005, 2 (01): : 34 - 39
  • [3] Prospective Study of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
    Bataille, Benoit
    Raoudha, Bennadji
    Le Tinier, Florence
    Basson, Laurent
    Escande, Alexandre
    Langin, Helene
    Tresch, Emmanuelle
    Crop, Frederik
    Darloy, Franck
    Carlier, Damien
    Lartigau, Eric
    Pasquier, David
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (12) : 1 - 13
  • [4] A matched-pair comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with cetuximab versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy with platinum-based chemotherapy for locally advanced head neck cancer
    Jiayi Huang
    Andrew M. Baschnagel
    Peter Chen
    Gregory Gustafson
    Ishmael Jaiyesmi
    Mitchell Folbe
    Hong Ye
    Jan Akervall
    Daniel Krauss
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2014, 19 : 240 - 246
  • [5] A matched-pair comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with cetuximab versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy with platinum-based chemotherapy for locally advanced head neck cancer
    Huang, Jiayi
    Baschnagel, Andrew M.
    Chen, Peter
    Gustafson, Gregory
    Jaiyesmi, Ishmael
    Folbe, Mitchell
    Ye, Hong
    Akervall, Jan
    Krauss, Daniel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 19 (02) : 240 - 246
  • [6] Adaptive method for multicriteria optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Kamal-Sayed, Hisham
    Ma, J.
    Tseung, H.
    Abdel-Rehim, A.
    Herman, M. G.
    Beltran, C. J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (12) : 5643 - 5652
  • [7] Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the treatment of head and neck cancer: A dosimetric comparison
    Nguyen, My-Lien
    Cantrell, J. Nathan
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    Henson, Christina
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2021, 46 (03) : 259 - 263
  • [8] Dose-volume constrained optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning
    Tanaka, Yoshihiro
    Fujimoto, Ken'ichi
    Yoshinaga, Tetsuya
    JOURNAL OF INEQUALITIES AND APPLICATIONS, 2015, : 1 - 13
  • [9] Definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer
    Chen, Chien-Chih
    Lin, Jin-Ching
    Jan, Jian-Sheng
    Ho, Shih-Chu
    Wang, Lily
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 122 (01) : 9 - 13
  • [10] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer involving the base of the skull
    Lee, Nancy Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (02): : S43 - S45