"It Hurts To Know...And It Helps": Exploring How Surrogates in the ICU Cope with Prognostic Information

被引:63
作者
Schenker, Yael [1 ]
White, Douglas B. [2 ]
Crowley-Matoka, Megan [3 ]
Dohan, Daniel [4 ]
Tiver, Greer A. [1 ]
Arnold, Robert M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Div Gen Internal Med, Sect Palliat Care & Med Eth, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Clin Res Invest & Syst Modeling Acute Illness CRI, Dept Crit Care Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Inst Hlth Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CRITICAL-CARE-MEDICINE; OF-LIFE CARE; DECISION-MAKERS; DISCUSSING PROGNOSIS; END; COMMUNICATION; AMERICAN; ILLNESS; FAMILY; UNIT;
D O I
10.1089/jpm.2012.0331
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Surrogates of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) want honest prognostic information, but they also want to hear good news. There has been little examination of how surrogates navigate these dual needs or how clinicians should respond. Objective: The aim of this study was explore how surrogates in the ICU experience and cope with prognostic information and describe their recommendations for clinicians. Methods: We conducted a qualitative interview study with 30 surrogates facing life-sustaining treatment decisions in five ICUs in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In-depth, semi-structured interviews with surrogates in the ICU focused on general experiences, emotional needs, informational needs, and recommendations for clinicians. We inductively analyzed transcripts for key themes using constant comparative methods. Results: Surrogates experience a tension between wanting to know what to expect and needing to remain hopeful. This tension underlies their experience receiving prognostic information and may lead to behaviors that allow continued hope in the face of bad news, including: 1) focusing on small details rather than the big picture, 2) relying on gut instincts or personal beliefs about the patient, 3) seeking more positive prognostic information from other sources, and, for a minority, 4) avoiding or disbelieving prognostic information. Surrogates emphasize the importance of frequent communication and call on physicians to gently help them prepare for the worst and hope for the best. Conclusions: Surrogates in the ICU experience conflicting emotional and informational needs. They describe behaviors that give the appearance of avoiding bad news while simultaneously asking physicians to help them cope with prognostic information.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 249
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]   Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit: American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004-2005 [J].
Davidson, Judy E. ;
Powers, Karen ;
Hedayat, Kamyar M. ;
Tieszen, Mark ;
Kon, Alexander A. ;
Shepard, Eric ;
Spuhler, Vicki ;
Todres, I. David ;
Levy, Mitchell ;
Barr, Juliana ;
Ghandi, Raj ;
Hirsch, Gregory ;
Armstrong, Deborah .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (02) :605-622
[12]   Teaching palliative care to critical care medicine trainees [J].
DeVita, MA ;
Arnold, RM ;
Barnard, D .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (04) :1257-1262
[13]   4 MODELS OF THE PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONSHIP [J].
EMANUEL, EJ ;
EMANUEL, LL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 267 (16) :2221-2226
[14]   Surrogate Decision-Makers' Perspectives on Discussing Prognosis in the Face of Uncertainty [J].
Evans, Leah R. ;
Boyd, Elizabeth A. ;
Malvar, Grace ;
Apatira, Latifat ;
Luce, John M. ;
Lo, Bernard ;
White, Douglas B. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 179 (01) :48-53
[15]   Prognosis communication in serious illness: Perceptions of older patients, caregivers, and clinicians [J].
Fried, TR ;
Bradley, EH ;
O'Leary, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2003, 51 (10) :1398-1403
[16]  
Grbich C., 2012, Qualitative data analysis, V2nd ed.
[17]  
Kaufman SR, 2006, AND TIME DIE AM HOSP
[18]   Information needs in terminal illness [J].
Kutner, JS ;
Steiner, JF ;
Corbett, KK ;
Jahnigen, DW ;
Barton, PL .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 48 (10) :1341-1352
[19]  
Kvale S., 1996, INTERVIEWS INTRO QUA, DOI [10.1016/S0149-7189(97)89858-8, DOI 10.1016/S0149-7189(97)89858-8]
[20]   Cognitive-emotional decision making (CEDM): A framework of patient medical decision making [J].
Power, Tara E. ;
Swartzman, Leora C. ;
Robinson, John W. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2011, 83 (02) :163-169