Lightweight protective configurations against blast and fragments impact: Experimental and numerical studies

被引:8
作者
Ahmed, Khurshid [1 ]
Malik, Abdul Qadeer [1 ]
Hussain, Arshad [1 ]
Ahmad, Iram Raza [1 ]
Ahmad, Iftikhar [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Chem & Mat Engn SCME, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
关键词
COMPOSITE; MECHANICS;
D O I
10.1063/5.0022982
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Lightweight protective configurations against blast and fragment impacts were studied experimentally and numerically. The configurations comprised different combinations of Kevlar fabrics, laminated GFRP (Glass Fiber Reinforced Polyester), polyurethane (PU) foam, and alumina (Al2O3). The polyurethane (PU)-sand multi-layer composition and a mixture of polyurethane-sand and polyurethane-alumina powder were also studied. The protective configurations were tested under static detonation of a scaled down artillery shell. Protective capabilities were tested against a peak incident overpressure of 57 psi and fragments weighing up to 4.3 g carrying velocities in the range of 961 m/s-1555 m/s. Numerical simulations were performed using ANSYS AUTODYN. The coupled SPH (Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics)-ALE (Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian) approach was used to simulate the interaction of fragments with protective configurations. A coupled Euler-ALE approach was employed for blast wave loading on protective configurations. The Kevlar fabrics, laminated GFRP, and PU foam compositions provided significant absorption and attenuation to impacting fragments. Configurations employing alumina tile were able to withstand both blast and fragment impacts without significant backface signatures (blunt force trauma). The configurations can be employed as body armor, vehicle armor, and for the safety and security of other critical infrastructures against blast wave and high velocity fragment impact. Numerical simulation results are in fair agreement with experimental results.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Abdalla M. A., 2012, ADV MAT RES, V576, P645, DOI [10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.576.645, DOI 10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/AMR.576.645]
  • [2] Adams B., 2006, SIMULATION BALLISTIC
  • [3] Experimental studies on blast mitigation capabilities of conventional dry aqueous foam
    Ahmed, Khurshid
    Malik, Abdul Qadeer
    [J]. AIP ADVANCES, 2020, 10 (06)
  • [4] Heterogeneous lightweight configuration for protection against 7.62 x 39 mm bullet impact
    Ahmed, Khurshid
    Malik, Abdul Qadeer
    Ahmad, Iram Raza
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROTECTIVE STRUCTURES, 2019, 10 (03) : 289 - 305
  • [5] Numerical Analysis for Critical Structures Protection against Blast Loading Using Metallic Panels
    Alogla, Ageel
    Helal, Mahmoud
    ElShafey, Mohamed Mokbel
    Fathallah, Elsayed
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (06):
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2011, CENT DYN REL 14 0 DO
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1983, 7 INT S BALL
  • [8] Dynamic response of laminated GFRP composite under low velocity impact: Experimental and Numerical study
    Ansari, Md. Muslim
    Chakrabarti, Anupam
    Iqbal, M. Ashraf
    [J]. PLASTICITY AND IMPACT MECHANICS, 2017, 173 : 153 - 160
  • [9] Ballistic Protection of Military Shelters from Mortar Fragmentation and Blast Effects using a Multi-layer Structure
    Elshenawy, T.
    Seoud, Mohamed Aboel
    Abdo, G. M.
    [J]. DEFENCE SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2019, 69 (06) : 538 - 544
  • [10] Enforcement N. L., 2001, 010104 NIJ