Do occupational health assessments match guidelines for low back pain?

被引:6
作者
Walsh, Luke [1 ]
Menzies, Donald [1 ]
Chamberlain, Kathryn [1 ]
Agius, Raymond [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gittins, Matthew [5 ]
机构
[1] Stockport NHS Fdn Trust, Stepping Hill Hosp, Dept Occupat Hlth, Stockport, Lancs, England
[2] Cent Manchester Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Occupat Hlth, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Manchester Childrens Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Manchester, Ctr Environm & Occupat Hlth, Manchester, Lancs, England
[5] Univ Manchester, Sch Community Based Med, Biostat Grp, Hlth Methodol Res Grp, Manchester, Lancs, England
来源
OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD | 2008年 / 58卷 / 07期
关键词
Audit; back pain; guidelines; occupational health;
D O I
10.1093/occmed/kqn097
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Audit is an important facet of clinical governance and good occupational health practice. There are well-established clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain. Occupational Health Guidelines for the Management of Low Back Pain at Work were launched by the Faculty of Occupational Medicine in March 2000, based on an extensive, systematic review of the scientific literature predominantly from occupational settings or concerning occupational outcomes. Aim To determine whether documented National Health Service occupational health assessment of low back pain in the North West region of England conforms to the published guidelines. Methods A retrospective audit of case notes was conducted. Six performance indicators were derived from the Occupational Health Guidelines for the Management of Low Back Pain at Work in order to evaluate the performance by occupational physicians. Two hundred and seventy-seven case notes were identified from eight different occupational health departments. Results Low rates of compliance with national standards were observed for recording of some performance indicators, notably for the assessment and documentation of 'red' and 'yellow flags'. Our findings suggest that the quality of documentation of key information in the notes leaves significant room for improvement. Conclusions For future audits, we recommend having two external auditors and seek to demonstrate a high degree of agreement between observers by conducting a reproducibility exercise. Future Faculty guidelines should emphasize documentation of the assessment and perhaps consider assessment tools to improve documentation.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 489
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Auditing occupational medicine [J].
Agius, RM .
OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 1999, 49 (04) :261-264
[2]   AUDIT OF SICKNESS ABSENCE AND FITNESS-FOR-WORK REFERRALS [J].
AGIUS, RM ;
SEATON, A ;
LEE, RJ .
OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 1995, 45 (03) :125-130
[3]  
Agius RM, 1999, EVALUATION OCCUPATIO, P53
[4]  
Andersson Gunnar B. J., 1997, P93
[5]  
Carter JT, 2000, OCCUPATIONAL HLTH GU
[6]   Development and evaluation of a quality assessment instrument for occupational physicians [J].
van der Weide, WE ;
Verbeek, JHAM ;
van Dijk, FJH ;
Hulshof, CTJ .
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1998, 55 (06) :375-382
[7]   Relation between indicators for quality of occupational rehabilitation of employees with low back pain [J].
van der Weide, WE ;
Verbeek, JHAM ;
van Dijk, FJH .
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1999, 56 (07) :488-493
[8]   An audit of occupational health care for employees with low-back pain [J].
vanderWeide, WE ;
Verbeek, JHAM ;
vanDijk, FJH ;
Doef, J .
OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 1997, 47 (05) :294-300
[9]   Early occupational health management of patients with back pain - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Verbeek, JH ;
van der Weide, WE ;
van Dijk, FJ .
SPINE, 2002, 27 (17) :1844-1850