Survey of image quality metrics from the perspective of detection and classification performance

被引:2
|
作者
Gazagnaire, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Naval Surface Warfare Ctr, Panama City Div, 110 Vernon Ave, Panama City, FL 32407 USA
来源
DETECTION AND SENSING OF MINES, EXPLOSIVE OBJECTS, AND OBSCURED TARGETS XXII | 2017年 / 10182卷
关键词
Image quality metrics; optical; radar; sonar; ATR; detection; classification; NATURAL IMAGES; STATISTICS; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1117/12.2262665
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Detection and classification of targets is a process that we perform every day, often without even realizing it; the ability to locate and recognize a specific face in a crowd, to be able to identify a bird by its song, or to know what is for dinner simply by the aroma. Much effort has been spent in trying to replicate these uncanny abilities of our senses through purpose-built sensors. For many of these sensing modalities, automatic target recognition algorithms have been developed to automate the process of locating and recognizing the occurrence of a specific state from within the sensed data. This survey is an overview of the metrics used to assess and quantify the quality or 'goodness' of the data, mainly for imaging sensors, from the perspective of automatic target recognition performance. Digital image data go through several transformations as they are moved from the recording sensor to personal electronic devices, resulting in distortions. There has been considerable research in the area of quality assessment of digital image and video media. Often, the image quality assessment approaches rely on having the original image or at least information about the original image available for the evaluation. These approaches may also rely on knowing the source of distortion. The accuracy is typically gauged using the image quality assessment made by the human visual system. As a consequence, the metrics measure aspects of the image that are tied closely to the human perception of quality. Evaluating image quality from an automatic target recognition perspective offers many challenges, as the original data is not likely to be available. Additionally, there may be multiple unknown sources of image quality degradation forcing the need for a general solution. Finally, the human perception of 'good quality' may not necessarily correlate to optimal image quality for automatic target recognition performance, in which case metrics modeled after the human visual system may not be the best choice for image quality assessment. The goal of this survey is to provide a high-level background and overview of how image quality assessment is currently performed for different sensing modalities. Additionally, the challenges that are being addressed within the various disciplines will be discussed and commonalities will be highlighted.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the Correlation Between Deepfake Detection Performance and Image Quality Metrics
    Kim, Hyunjoon
    Lee, Jaehee
    Park, Leo Hyun
    Kwon, Taekyoung
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD ACM WORKSHOP ON SECURITY IMPLICATIONS OF DEEPFAKES AND CHEAPFAKES, ACM WDC 2024, 2024, : 14 - 19
  • [2] Image Tampering Detection Using No-Reference Image Quality Metrics
    Ying Li
    Bo Wang
    Xiang-Wei Kong
    Yan-Qing Guo
    Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(New series), 2014, (06) : 51 - 56
  • [3] Image forgery detection by means of No-Reference quality metrics
    Battisti, F.
    Carli, M.
    Neri, A.
    MEDIA WATERMARKING, SECURITY, AND FORENSICS 2012, 2012, 8303
  • [4] A Survey of Wound Image Analysis Using Deep Learning: Classification, Detection, and Segmentation
    Zhang, Ruyi
    Tian, Dingcheng
    Xu, Dechao
    Qian, Wei
    Yao, Yudong
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 79502 - 79515
  • [5] Skin Disease Classification from Image - A Survey
    Goswami, Tanvi
    Dabhi, Vipul K.
    Prajapati, Harshadkumar B.
    2020 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (ICACCS), 2020, : 599 - 605
  • [6] Image quality metrics for the evaluation of print quality
    Pedersen, Marius
    Bonnier, Nicolas
    Hardeberg, Jon Y.
    Albregtsen, Fritz
    IMAGE QUALITY AND SYSTEM PERFORMANCE VIII, 2011, 7867
  • [7] Image quality in image classification: Adaptive image quality modification with adaptive classification
    Yan, Shuo
    Sayad, Saed
    Balke, Stephen T.
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 33 (02) : 429 - 435
  • [8] Pathological Brain Image Segmentation and Classification: A Survey
    Yasmin, Mussarat
    Sharif, Muhammad
    Mohsin, Sajjad
    Azam, Faisal
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2014, 10 (03) : 163 - 177
  • [9] Performance of classification models from a user perspective
    Martens, David
    Vanthienen, Jan
    Verbeke, Wouter
    Baesens, Bart
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2011, 51 (04) : 782 - 793
  • [10] MRI pyschophysics: An experimental framework relating image quality to diagnostic performance metrics
    Durand, Daniel J.
    Carrino, John A.
    Fayad, Laura M.
    Huisman, Thierry A. G. M.
    El-Sharkawy, AbdEl-Monem M.
    Edelstein, William A.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 37 (06) : 1402 - 1408