共 50 条
Evidence-based review and assessment of botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of adult spasticity in the upper motor neuron syndrome
被引:96
|作者:
Esquenazi, Alberto
[1
]
Albanese, Alberto
[2
]
Chancellor, Michael B.
[3
]
Elovic, Elie
Segal, Karen R.
Simpson, David M.
[4
]
Smith, Christopher P.
[5
]
Ward, Anthony B.
[6
]
机构:
[1] MossRehab & Albert Einstein Med Ctr, Elkins Pk, PA 19027 USA
[2] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fdn IRCCS Ist Neurol Carlo Besta, Ist Nazl Neurol Carlo Besta, I-20133 Milan, MI, Italy
[3] Oakland Univ, William Beaumont Sch Med, William Beaumont Hosp, Dept Urol, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
[4] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Clin Neurophysiol Labs, Neuromuscular Div, NeuroAIDS Program, New York, NY 10029 USA
[5] Baylor Coll Med, Scott Dept Urol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Univ Hosp North Staffordshire, Haywood Hosp, North Staffordshire Rehabil Ctr, Stoke On Trent ST4 7PA, Staffs, England
来源:
关键词:
Botulinum neurotoxin;
Adult spasticity;
Upper motor neuron syndrome;
Upper limb spasticity;
Lower limp spasticity;
Evidenced-based review;
UPPER-LIMB SPASTICITY;
TOXIN TYPE-A;
SPINAL-CORD-INJURY;
PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL;
DOUBLE-BLIND;
MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS;
EQUINOVARUS DEFORMITY;
BRAIN-INJURY;
NT;
201;
STROKE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.11.025
中图分类号:
R9 [药学];
学科分类号:
1007 ;
摘要:
Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) can be injected to achieve therapeutic benefit across a large range of clinical conditions. To assess the efficacy and safety of BoNT injections for the treatment of spasticity associated with the upper motor neuron syndrome (UMNS), an expert panel reviewed evidence from the published literature. Data sources included English-language studies identified via MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Current Contents, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Evidence tables generated in the 2008 Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) review of the use of BoNT for autonomic disorders were also reviewed and updated. The panel evaluated evidence at several levels, supporting BoNT as a class, the serotypes BoNT-A and BoNT-B, as well as the four individual commercially available formulations: abobotulinumtoxinA (A/Abo), onabotulinumtoxinA (A/Ona), incobotulinumtoxinA (A/Inco), and rimabotulinumtoxinB (B/Rima). The panel ultimately made recommendations on the effectiveness of BoNT for the management of spasticity, based upon the strength of clinical evidence and following the AAN classification scale. While the prior report by the AAN provided recommendations for the use of BoNT as a class of drug, this report provides more detail and includes recommendations for the individual formulations. For the treatment of upper limb spasticity, the evidence supported a Level A recommendation for BoNT-A, A/Abo, and A/Ona, with a Level B recommendation for A/Inco; there was insufficient evidence to support a recommendation for B/Rima. For lower limb spasticity, there was sufficient clinical evidence to support a Level A recommendation for A/Ona individually and BoNT-A in aggregate; the clinical evidence for A/Abo supported a Level C recommendation; and there was insufficient information to recommend A/Inco and B/Rima (Level U). There is a need for further comparative effectiveness studies of the available BoNT formulations for the management of spasticity. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 128
页数:14
相关论文