Regulatory theory insights into setting the past, present and future of general purpose water accounting standard setting

被引:39
作者
Chalmers, Keryn [1 ]
Godfrey, Jayne M. [2 ]
Lynch, Barbara [3 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Caulfield, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Deakin Univ, Warrnambool, Australia
来源
ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL | 2012年 / 25卷 / 06期
关键词
Water accounting; Financial accounting; Regulatory theory; Public interest; Private interest; Regulatory capture; Accounting; Water; Water industry; Finance; POLITICS; CAPTURE;
D O I
10.1108/09513571211250224
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose - Accounting and water industry experts are developing general-purpose water accounting (GPWA) to report information about water and rights to water. The system has the potential to affect water policies, pricing and management, and investment and other decisions that are affected by GPW A report users' understanding of water risks faced by an entity. It may also affect financial returns to accounting and auditing firms and firms in water industries. In this paper the authors aim to examine the roles of the accounting profession, water industries and other stakeholders in governing GPWA. Recognising that the fate of GPWA depends partly upon regulatory power and economics, they seek to apply regulatory theories that explain financial accounting standards development to speculate about the national and international future of GPWA. Design/methodology/approach - Official documents, internal Water Accounting Standards Board documents and unstructured interviews underpin the authors' analysis. Findings - The authors speculate about the benefits that might accrue to various stakeholder groups from capturing the GPWA standard-setting process. They also suggest that internationally, water industries may dominate early GPWA standards development in the public interest and that regulatory capture by accounting or water industry professionals will not necessarily conflict with public interest benefits. Practical implications - Accounting for water can affect allocations of environmental, economic, social and other resources; also, accounting and water industry professional standing and revenues. In this paper the authors identify factors influencing GPWA standards and standard-setting institutional arrangements, and thereby these resource allocations. The paper generates an awareness of GPWA's emergence and practical implications. Originality/value - This is an early study to investigate water accounting standard-setting regulatory influences and their impact.
引用
收藏
页码:1001 / 1024
页数:24
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], MANAGING WATER AUSTR
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1987, Accounting and Business Research, DOI DOI 10.1080/00014788.1987.9729807
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2001, Abacus, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-6281.00088
  • [4] [Anonymous], COMP INT ACCOUNTING
  • [5] [Anonymous], AUSTRALIAN
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2009, EVOLUTION LAW POLITI
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2007, National Biotechnology Audit, P1
  • [8] Bega S., 2009, STAR
  • [9] The limits of markets: the politics of water management in rural Australia
    Bell, Stephen
    Quiggin, John
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2008, 17 (05) : 712 - 729
  • [10] Branigan T., 2009, DROUGHT THREATENS CH