MR flow mapping in coronary artery bypass grafts: A validation study with Doppler flow measurements

被引:27
作者
Langerak, SE
Kunz, P
Vliegen, HW
Jukema, JW
Zwinderman, AH
Steendijk, P
Lamb, HJ
van der Wall, EE
de Roos, A
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Stat, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Interuniv Cardiol Inst Netherlands, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
arteries; grafts and prostheses; MR; stenosis or obstruction; blood; flow dynamics; coronary vessels; magnetic resonance (MR); vascular studies; ultrasound; (US); Doppler studies;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2221010560
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To validate fast magnetic resonance (MR) flow mapping with intravascular Doppler flow measurements in vitro and in patients with nonstenotic and stenotic coronary artery bypass grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR and Doppler flow measurements were performed in a small-diameter flow phantom with physiologic flow conditions and at baseline and during adenosine stress in 27 grafts in 23 patients, who were scheduled for cardiac catheterization. At invasive analysis, the grafts were divided into those with stenosis of less than 50% (nonstenotic) and those with stenosis greater than or equal to 50% (stenotic). In vitro velocity values and velocity values in nonstenotic and stenotic grafts were compared with linear regression analysis, and the in vitro interstudy variability was determined. RESULTS: Excellent correlations in average peak velocity (r = 0.99, P < .001) and diastolic peak velocity (r = 0.99, P < .001) were demonstrated in vitro between MR and Doppler flow measurements, with less than 5% interstudy variability. MR and Doppler flow measurements revealed good correlations in peak velocity and velocity reserve both in nonstenotic (n = 20) (average peak velocity: r = 0.81, P < .001; diastolic peak velocity: r = 0.83, P < .001; velocity reserve: r = 0.56, P = .010) and stenotic (n = 7) (average peak velocity: r = 0.83, P < .001; diastolic peak velocity: r = 0.78, P < .001; velocity reserve: r = 0.70, P = .078) grafts. CONCLUSION: Fast MR flow mapping provides noninvasive measures of peak velocity and velocity reserve, which closely correlate with Doppler values both in vitro and in nonstenotic and stenotic grafts.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 135
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[31]  
Shibata M, 1999, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V10, P563, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199910)10:4<563::AID-JMRI9>3.3.CO
[32]  
2-8
[33]   THE SIGNIFICANCE OF CORONARY RESERVE IN CLINICAL HEART-DISEASE [J].
STRAUER, BE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1990, 15 (04) :775-783
[34]  
UNDERWOOD SR, 1987, BRIT HEART J, V57, P404
[35]   Dobutamine Stress Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease [J].
van Rugge, F. Paul ;
van der Wall, Ernst E. ;
de Roos, Albert ;
Bruschke, Albert V. G. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 22 (02) :431-439
[36]   IS ATRIAL-PACING NEEDED FOR DETERMINATION OF CORONARY FLOW RESERVE BY PARAMETRIC IMAGING [J].
VASSALLI, G ;
HESS, OM ;
KROGMANN, ON ;
OECHSLIN, E ;
GRIMM, J ;
JIANG, ZH ;
KRAYENBUEHL, HP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 71 (05) :415-419
[37]   Contrast-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography for evaluating patency of coronary artery bypass grafts [J].
Vrachliotis, TG ;
Bis, KG ;
Aliabadi, D ;
Shetty, AN ;
Safian, R ;
Simonetti, O .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (04) :1073-1080
[38]   CLINICAL-APPLICATIONS OF DOPPLER CORONARY FLOW RESERVE MEASUREMENTS [J].
WHITE, CW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 71 (14) :D10-D16
[39]   EFFECTS OF ADENOSINE ON HUMAN CORONARY ARTERIAL CIRCULATION [J].
WILSON, RF ;
WYCHE, K ;
CHRISTENSEN, BV ;
ZIMMER, S ;
LAXSON, DD .
CIRCULATION, 1990, 82 (05) :1595-1606
[40]   Patency of coronary bypass grafts:: Assessment with breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography -: Value of a non-electrocardiographically triggered technique [J].
Wintersperger, BJ ;
Engelmann, MG ;
von Smekal, A ;
Knez, A ;
Penzkofer, HV ;
Höfling, B ;
Laub, G ;
Reiser, MF .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 208 (02) :345-351