Can a stock exchange improve corporate behavior? Evidence from firms' migration to premium listings in Brazil

被引:38
作者
de Carvalho, Antonio Gledson [2 ]
Pennacchi, George G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Coll Business, Dept Finance, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[2] Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Sch Business, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Premium listings; Bonding; Cross-listings; CROSS-LISTINGS; PRIVATE BENEFITS; MARKETS; GOVERNANCE; PROTECTION; DISCLOSURE; ASSET; TOP;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.01.003
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Because Brazil's legal system lacked protection for minority shareholders and trading of Brazilian shares flowed to U.S. exchanges, in 2001 the Sao Paulo Stock Exchange, Bovespa, created three premium exchange listings that require more stringent shareholder protections. This paper examines the effects of a commitment to improved corporate disclosure and governance by firms' voluntary migration to these premium listings. Our analysis finds that a firm's migration brings positive abnormal returns to its shareholders, particularly when its shares did not have a prior cross-listing on a U.S. exchange and also when the firm chooses a premium listing with the highest standards. Migration to a premium listing also leads to a significant increase in the trading volume of non-voting shares. Firms that choose a premium listing tend to have growth opportunities that they finance with subsequent seasoned equity offerings. These results suggest that a premium listing is a mechanism for bonding to improved corporate behavior that can be less costly than cross-listing on a U.S. exchange. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:883 / 903
页数:21
相关论文
共 44 条
[11]  
Coffee JC, 1999, NORTHWEST U LAW REV, V93, P641
[12]   Racing towards the top?: The impact of cross-listings, and stock market competition on international corporate governance [J].
Coffee, JC .
COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 2002, 102 (07) :1757-1831
[13]   Why are foreign firms listed in the US worth more? [J].
Doidge, C ;
Karolyi, GA ;
Stulz, RM .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 71 (02) :205-238
[14]   US cross-listings and the private benefits of control: evidence from dual-class firms [J].
Doidge, C .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 72 (03) :519-553
[15]   Has New York become less competitive than London in global markets? Evaluating foreign listing choices over time [J].
Doidge, Craig ;
Karolyi, G. Andrew ;
Stulz, Rene M. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 91 (03) :253-277
[16]   Private benefits of control: An international comparison [J].
Dyck, A ;
Zingales, L .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2004, 59 (02) :537-600
[17]   Corporate governance, idiosyncratic risk, and information flow [J].
Ferreira, Miguel A. ;
Laux, Paul A. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2007, 62 (02) :951-989
[18]   Coase versus the Coasians [J].
Glaeser, E ;
Johnson, S ;
Shleifer, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2001, 116 (03) :853-899
[19]   Stock exchange governance initiatives: Evidence from the Italian STARs [J].
Gleason, Kimberly C. ;
Madura, Jeff ;
Subrahmanyam, Vijaya .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2007, 31 (01) :141-159
[20]   Where is the market? Evidence from cross-listings in the United States [J].
Halling, Michael ;
Pagano, Marco ;
Randl, Otto ;
Zechner, Josef .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2008, 21 (02) :725-761