Stress distribution in implant-supported prosthesis with external and internal implant-abutment connections

被引:15
作者
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [1 ]
Pesqueira, Aldieris Alves [1 ]
Falcon-Antenucci, Rosse Mary [1 ]
dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [1 ]
Haddad, Marcela Filie [1 ]
Bannwart, Lisiane Cristina [1 ]
Moreno, Amalia [1 ]
机构
[1] Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
dental implants; biomechanics; fixed prosthesis; photoelastic stress analysis; screw retained; DESIGNS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.3109/00016357.2012.672823
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. This study aimed to investigate the stress distribution in screwed implant-supported prostheses with different implant-abutment connections by using a photoelastic analysis. Materials and methods. Four photoelastic models were fabricated in PL-2 resin and divided according to the implant-abutment connection (external hexagon (EH) and Morse taper (MT) implants (3.75 x 11.5 mm)) and the number crowns (single and 3-unit piece). Models were positioned in a circular polariscope and 100-N axial and oblique (45) loading were applied in the occlusal surface of the crowns by using a universal testing machine. The stresses were photographically recorded and qualitatively analyzed using software (Adobe Photoshop). Results. Under axial loading, the MT implants exhibited a lower number of fringes for single-unit crowns than EH implants, whereas for a 3-unit piece the MT implants showed a higher number of fringes vs EH implants. The oblique loading increased the number of fringes for all groups. Conclusion. In conclusion, the MT implant-abutment connection reduced the amount of stress in single-unit crowns, for 3-unit piece crowns the amount of stress was lower using an external hexagon connection. The stress pattern was similar for all groups. Oblique loading promoted a higher stress concentration than axial loading.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 288
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Influence of occlusal forces on stress distribution in preloaded dental implant screws
    Alkan, I
    Sertgöz, A
    Ekici, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2004, 91 (04) : 319 - 325
  • [2] Astra Tech and Branemark system implants:: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions
    Åstrand, P
    Engquist, B
    Dahlgren, S
    Gröndahl, K
    Engquist, E
    Feldmann, H
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2004, 15 (04) : 413 - 420
  • [3] Binon PP, 2000, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V15, P76
  • [4] Implant design and interface force transfer - A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis
    Cehreli, M
    Duyck, J
    De Cooman, M
    Puers, R
    Naert, I
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2004, 15 (02) : 249 - 257
  • [5] Influence of the Connector and Implant Design on the Implant-Tooth-Connected Prostheses
    da Silva, Edmar Ferreira
    Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza
    Quinelli Mazaro, Jose Vitor
    Garcia, Idelmo Rangel, Jr.
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 12 (03) : 254 - 262
  • [6] Deporter D, 2001, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V16, P653
  • [7] Doring K, 2001, J ORAL IMPLANTOL, V30, P198
  • [8] Drago Carl J, 2006, Compend Contin Educ Dent, V27, P266
  • [9] Duyck J, 1997, Technol Health Care, V5, P253
  • [10] Fanuscu Mete I, 2004, J Prosthodont, V13, P214