Fully automated detection and localization of clinically significant prostate cancer on MR images using a cascaded convolutional neural network

被引:9
作者
Zhu, Lina [1 ]
Gao, Ge [2 ]
Zhu, Yi [3 ]
Han, Chao [2 ]
Liu, Xiang [2 ]
Li, Derun [4 ]
Liu, Weipeng [5 ]
Wang, Xiangpeng [5 ]
Zhang, Jingyuan [5 ]
Zhang, Xiaodong [2 ]
Wang, Xiaoying [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiol, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Radiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Philips Healthcare, Dept Clin & Tech Support, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Urol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Smart Tree Med Technol Co Ltd, Dept Dev & Res, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 12卷
关键词
deep learning; prostatic neoplasms; magnetic resonance imaging; detection; localization; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.958065
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeTo develop a cascaded deep learning model trained with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) for fully automated detection and localization of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). MethodsThis retrospective study included 347 consecutive patients (235 csPCa, 112 non-csPCa) with high-quality prostate MRI data, which were randomly selected for training, validation, and testing. The ground truth was obtained using manual csPCa lesion segmentation, according to pathological results. The proposed cascaded model based on Res-UNet takes prostate MR images (T2WI+ADC or only ADC) as inputs and automatically segments the whole prostate gland, the anatomic zones, and the csPCa region step by step. The performance of the models was evaluated and compared with PI-RADS (version 2.1) assessment using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) in the held-out test set. ResultsIn the test set, the per-lesion sensitivity of the biparametric (ADC + T2WI) model, ADC model, and PI-RADS assessment were 95.5% (84/88), 94.3% (83/88), and 94.3% (83/88) respectively (all p > 0.05). Additionally, the mean DSC based on the csPCa lesions were 0.64 +/- 0.24 and 0.66 +/- 0.23 for the biparametric model and ADC model, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the biparametric model were 95.6% (108/113), 91.5% (665/727), and 92.0% (773/840) based on sextant, and were 98.6% (68/69), 64.8% (46/71), and 81.4% (114/140) based on patients. The biparametric model had a similar performance to PI-RADS assessment (p > 0.05) and had higher specificity than the ADC model (86.8% [631/727], p< 0.001) based on sextant. ConclusionThe cascaded deep learning model trained with ADC and T2WI achieves good performance for automated csPCa detection and localization.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater
    Brown, Louise C.
    Gabe, Rhian
    Kaplan, Richard
    Parmar, Mahesh K.
    Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda
    Ward, Katie
    Hindley, Richard G.
    Freeman, Alex
    Kirkham, Alex P.
    Oldroyd, Robert
    Parker, Chris
    Emberton, Mark
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) : 815 - 822
  • [2] Semi-automatic classification of prostate cancer on multi-parametric MR imaging using a multi-channel 3D convolutional neural network
    Aldoj, Nader
    Lukas, Steffen
    Dewey, Marc
    Penzkofer, Tobias
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (02) : 1243 - 1253
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, P MED IM COMP COMP A
  • [4] Radiomic Machine Learning for Characterization of Prostate Lesions with MRI: Comparison to ADC Values
    Bonekamp, David
    Kohl, Simon
    Wiesenfarth, Manuel
    Schelb, Patrick
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    Goetz, Michael
    Kickingereder, Philipp
    Yaqubi, Kaneschka
    Hitthaler, Bertram
    Gaehlert, Nils
    Kuder, Tristan Anselm
    Deister, Fenja
    Freitag, Martin
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Hadaschik, Boris A.
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Maier-Hein, Klaus H.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (01) : 128 - 137
  • [5] Direct Comparison of PI-RADS Version 2 and 2.1 in Transition Zone Lesions for Detection of Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Experience
    Byun, Jieun
    Park, Kye Jin
    Kim, Mi-hyun
    Kim, Jeong Kon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 52 (02) : 577 - 586
  • [6] Joint Prostate Cancer Detection and Gleason Score Prediction in mp-MRI via FocalNet
    Cao, Ruiming
    Bajgiran, Amirhossein Mohammadian
    Mirak, Sohrab Afshari
    Shakeri, Sepideh
    Zhong, Xinran
    Enzmann, Dieter
    Raman, Steven
    Sung, Kyunghyun
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 38 (11) : 2496 - 2506
  • [7] Evaluating White Matter Lesion Segmentations with Refined SOrensen-Dice Analysis
    Carass, Aaron
    Roy, Snehashis
    Gherman, Adrian
    Reinhold, Jacob C.
    Jesson, Andrew
    Arbel, Tal
    Maier, Oskar
    Handels, Heinz
    Ghafoorian, Mohsen
    Platel, Bram
    Birenbaum, Ariel
    Greenspan, Hayit
    Pham, Dzung L.
    Crainiceanu, Ciprian M.
    Calabresi, Peter A.
    Prince, Jerry L.
    Roncal, William R. Gray
    Shinohara, Russell T.
    Oguz, Ipek
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [8] Prebiopsy Biparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2: A Multicenter Study
    Choi, Moon Hyung
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Lee, Young Joon
    Jung, Seung Eun
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 212 (04) : 839 - 846
  • [9] Deep learning-assisted prostate cancer detection on bi-parametric MRI: minimum training data size requirements and effect of prior knowledge
    Hosseinzadeh, Matin
    Saha, Anindo
    Brand, Patrick
    Slootweg, Ilse
    de Rooij, Maarten
    Huisman, Henkjan
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (04) : 2224 - 2234
  • [10] Multiparametric MR Imaging with Ultrasound Guidance Improves Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Biopsies
    McDowell, Monica
    [J]. RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 94 (06) : 456 - 457