Notions of quality and standards for qualitative research reporting

被引：9

作者：

Pearson, Alan ^{[1
]}

Jordan, Zoe ^{[1
]}

Lockwood, Craig ^{[1
]}

Aromataris, Ed ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Translat Hlth Sci, Joanna Briggs Inst, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE | 2015年 / 21卷 / 05期

关键词：

evidence-based health; qualitative research; quality; reporting; standards; GUIDELINES;

D O I：

10.1111/ijn.12331

中图分类号：

R47 [护理学];

学科分类号：

1011 ;

摘要：

The utility of qualitative research findings in the health sciences has been the subject of considerable debate, particularly with the advent of qualitative systematic reviews in recent years. There has been a significant investment in the production of guidance to improve the reporting of quantitative research; however, comparatively little time has been spent on developing the same for qualitative research reporting. This paper sets out to examine the possibility of developing a framework for refereed journals to utilize when guiding authors on how to report the results of qualitative studies in the hope that this will improve the quality of reports and subsequently their inclusion in qualitative syntheses and guidelines to inform practice at the point of care.

引用

页码：670 / 676

页数：7

共 24 条

[1]

[Anonymous], QUALITATIVE HLTH RES

[2]

[Anonymous], INT J QUALITY HLTH C

[3]

[Anonymous], 2004, Sense About Science

[4] Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? [J].