Safety and efficacy of cervical disc arthroplasty in preventing the adjacent segment disease: a meta-analysis of mid- to long-term outcomes in prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter studies

被引:32
作者
Latka, Dariusz [1 ,2 ]
Kozlowska, Klaudia [3 ]
Miekisiak, Grzegorz [1 ,2 ]
Latka, Kajetan [2 ]
Chowaniec, Jacek [2 ]
Olbrycht, Tomasz [2 ]
Latka, Miroslaw [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Opole, Inst Med, Dept Anat, Opole, Poland
[2] Univ Hosp Opole, Dept Neurosurg, Al Witosa 26, PL-45418 Opole, Poland
[3] Tech Univ Wroclaw, Inst Biomed Engn, Dept Bioengn, Wroclaw, Poland
关键词
cervical disc arthroplasty; CDA; anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; ACDF; cervical degenerative disc disease; CDDD; meta-analysis; randomized controlled trial; RCT; cervical total disc replacement; CTDR; INVESTIGATIONAL-DEVICE-EXEMPTION; PRESTIGE LP DISC; 7-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; SINGLE-LEVEL; ANTERIOR DISKECTOMY; CLINICAL-TRIAL; ARTIFICIAL DISC; RADIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS; FUSION ACDF; REPLACEMENT;
D O I
10.2147/TCRM.S196349
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has become an alternative treatment for cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. This technique preserves appropriate motion at both the index and adjacent disc levels and consequently may prevent adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). The authors performed a meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of CDA to those of the gold standard, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Both surgical and clinical parameters were employed to verify the hypothesis that CDA can reduce the risk of ASD. Methods: The meta-analysis comprised high-quality randomized controlled trials that compared CDA and ACDF treatments of cervical degenerative disc disease. Included papers reported data for at least one of the following outcomes: 1) surgical parameters, 2) questionnaire clinical indices (pre- and postoperative values), and 3) complication rates at 24 months; in addition, for ASD we analyzed 60 month or longer follow-ups. We used mean differences (MDs) or ORs to compare treatment effects between CDA and ACDF. Results: Twenty studies with 3,656 patients (2,140 with CDA and 1,516 with ACDF) met the inclusion criteria. CDA surgery, with mean duration longer than that of ACDF, was associated with higher blood loss. Visual analog scale neck pain score was significantly smaller for CDA (mean difference =-2.30, 95% CI [-3.72; -0.87], P=0.002). The frequency of dysphagia/dysphonia (OR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.49; 0.98], P=0.04) as well as the long-term ASD rate for CDA was significantly smaller (OR = 0.33, 95% CI [0.21; 0.50], P<0.0001). Conclusion: A significantly lower probability of ASD reoperations in the CDA cohort after a 60-month or longer follow-up was the most important finding of this study. Despite the moderate quality of this evidence, the pooled data corroborated for the very first time that CDA was efficacious in preventing ASD.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 539
页数:9
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Adverse Events in Total Disc Replacement: A Meta-Analysis of FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data
    Anderson, Paul A.
    Nassr, Ahmad
    Currier, Bradford L.
    Sebastian, Arjun S.
    Arnold, Paul M.
    Fehlings, Michael G.
    Mroz, Thomas E.
    Riew, K. Daniel
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 7 : 765 - 835
  • [2] Arthroplasty Versus Fusion in Single-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease A Cochrane Review
    Boselie, Toon F. M.
    Willems, Paul C.
    van Mameren, Henk
    de Bie, Rob A.
    Benzel, Edward C.
    van Santbrink, Henk
    [J]. SPINE, 2013, 38 (17) : E1096 - E1107
  • [3] Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial
    Burkus, J. Kenneth
    Traynelis, Vincent C.
    Haid, Regis W., Jr.
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 21 (04) : 516 - 528
  • [4] Cason GW, 2013, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V95A, P279, DOI [10.2106/JBJS.L.01568, 10.2106/JBJS.J.01042]
  • [5] Durability of cervical disc arthroplasties and its influence factors A systematic review and a network meta-analysis
    Chen, Chao
    Zhang, Xiaolin
    Ma, Xinlong
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (06)
  • [6] Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the KineflexIC artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up Clinical article
    Coric, Domagoj
    Nunley, Pierce D.
    Guyer, Richard D.
    Musante, David
    Carmody, Cameron N.
    Gordon, Charles R.
    Lauryssen, Carl
    Ohnmeiss, Donna D.
    Boltes, Margaret O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2011, 15 (04) : 348 - 358
  • [7] Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results
    Davis, Reginald J.
    Nunley, Pierce Dalton
    Kim, Kee D.
    Hisey, Michael S.
    Jackson, Robert J.
    Bae, Hyun W.
    Hoffman, Gregory A.
    Gaede, Steven E.
    Danielson, Guy O., III
    Gordon, Charles
    Stone, Marcus B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2015, 22 (01) : 15 - 25
  • [8] Anterior Cervical Discectomy with Arthroplasty versus Arthrodesis for Single-Level Cervical Spondylosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Fallah, Aria
    Akl, Elie A.
    Ebrahim, Shanil
    Ibrahim, George M.
    Mansouri, Alireza
    Foote, Clary J.
    Zhang, Yuqing
    Fehlings, Michael G.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (08):
  • [9] A Meta-Analysis Comparing the Results of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for the Treatment of Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease
    Gao, Yu
    Liu, Ming
    Li, Tao
    Huang, Fuguo
    Tang, Tingting
    Xiang, Zhou
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 95A (06) : 555 - 561
  • [10] Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine
    Goffin, J
    Geusens, E
    Vantomme, N
    Quintens, E
    Waerzeggers, Y
    Depreitere, B
    Van Calenbergh, F
    van Loon, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2004, 17 (02): : 79 - 85