Positive and Negative Factors That Influence Health Care Faculty Intent to Engage in Interprofessional Education (IPE)

被引:20
作者
Olenick, Maria [1 ]
Flowers, Monica [1 ]
Munecas, Teresa [1 ]
Maltseva, Tatayana [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida Int Univ, Nicole Wertheim Coll Nursing & Hlth Sci, 11200 SW 8th St,AHC3 Rm 329, Miami, FL 33199 USA
关键词
interprofessional; interdisciplinary; health care faculty; barriers; COLLABORATION;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare7010029
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study explored the positive and negative factors that influence interprofessional education (IPE) implementation in health care education programs across the United States. Methods: The study sample consisted of 439 (response rate 8.4%) health care faculties from seven health care professions (nursing, medicine, pharmacy, physical therapy, occupational therapy, physician assistant, and social work) who were asked what the positive and negative factors are that influence their decisions to engage in IPE. Results: Three positive categories and two negative categories concerning factors that influence health care faculty (HCF) intent to engage in IPE emerged. The three major categories of positive factors emerged as patient care, which was mentioned by 196 subjects or 54% of the sample, student learning, which was mentioned by 157 subjects or 43% of the sample, and health care teams, which was mentioned by 88 subjects or 24% of the sample. The two major categories of negative factors emerged as scheduling and coordination, which was mentioned by 230 subjects or 63% of the sample, and discipline culture which was mentioned by 103 subjects or 28% of the sample. Conclusion: This study contributes to the body of knowledge concerning the factors that influence effective IPE implementation. Discussion is provided regarding the positive and negative categories that emerged and how they influence effective IPE delivery.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Interprofessional education in graduate medical education: survey study of residency program directors [J].
Al Achkar, Morhaf ;
Hanauer, Mathew ;
Colavecchia, Chantel ;
Seehusen, Dean A. .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 18
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, FUT NURS LEAD CHANG
[3]  
[Anonymous], SURG NEUROL INT S7, DOI DOI 10.4103/2152-7806.139612
[4]  
Burns N., 2012, The Practice of Nursing Research
[5]  
Dillman D.A., 2014, INTERNET PHONE MAIL, VFourth
[6]   Addressing the Interprofessional Collaboration Competencies of the Association of American Medical Colleges: A Systematic Review of Assessment Instruments in Undergraduate Medical Education [J].
Havyer, Rachel D. ;
Nelson, Darlene R. ;
Wingo, Majken T. ;
Comfere, Nneka I. ;
Halvorsen, Andrew J. ;
McDonald, Furman S. ;
Reed, Darcy A. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2016, 91 (06) :865-888
[7]   Views of patient, healthcare professionals and administrative staff on flow of information and collaboration in a regional health information exchange: a qualitative study [J].
Maenpaa, Tiina ;
Asikainen, Paula ;
Suominen, Tarja .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2017, 31 (04) :939-947
[8]   Effective management of patients with diabetes foot ulcers: outcomes of an Interprofessional Diabetes Foot Ulcer Team [J].
Ogrin, Rajna ;
Houghton, Pamela E. ;
Thompson, G. William .
INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2015, 12 (04) :377-386
[9]   Interprofessional education: a concept analysis [J].
Olenick, Maria ;
Allen, Lois ;
Smego, Raymond, Jr. .
ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, 2010, 1 :75-84
[10]   Glycemic control: Can nurse practitioners on interprofessional collaborative practice teams enhance clinical outcomes? [J].
Parker, Ramona Ann ;
Hook, Linda D. ;
Jones, Mary Elaine .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2016, 28 (12) :652-658