Circadian Regulation of Bird Song, Call, and Locomotor Behavior by Pineal Melatonin in the Zebra Finch

被引:47
|
作者
Wang, Gang [1 ]
Harpole, Clifford E. [1 ]
Trivedi, Amit K. [1 ]
Cassone, Vincent M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Dept Biol, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Ctr Biol Clocks Res, College Stn, TX USA
关键词
zebra finch; Taeniopygia guttata; pineal; melatonin; circadian rhythm; birdsong; locomotor activity; HOUSE SPARROW; PASSER-DOMESTICUS; BODY-TEMPERATURE; CONTROL-SYSTEM; CHICK BRAIN; RHYTHMS; SLEEP; RECEPTORS; PATTERNS; BINDING;
D O I
10.1177/0748730411435965
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
As both a photoreceptor and pacemaker in the avian circadian clock system, the pineal gland is crucial for maintaining and synchronizing overt circadian rhythms in processes such as locomotor activity and body temperature through its circadian secretion of the pineal hormone melatonin. In addition to receptor presence in circadian and visual system structures, high-affinity melatonin binding and receptor mRNA are present in the song control system of male oscine passeriform birds. The present study explores the role of pineal melatonin in circadian organization of singing and calling behavior in comparison to locomotor activity under different lighting conditions. Similar to locomotor activity, both singing and calling behavior were regulated on a circadian basis by the central clock system through pineal melatonin, since these behaviors free-ran with a circadian period and since pinealectomy abolished them in constant environmental conditions. Further, rhythmic melatonin administration restored their rhythmicity. However, the rates by which these behaviors became arrhythmic and the rates of their entrainment to rhythmic melatonin administration differed among locomotor activity, singing and calling under constant dim light and constant bright light. Overall, the study demonstrates a role for pineal melatonin in regulating circadian oscillations of avian vocalizations in addition to locomotor activity. It is suggested that these behaviors might be controlled by separable circadian clockworks and that pineal melatonin entrains them all through a circadian clock.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 155
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Melatonin affects the temporal organization of the song of the zebra finch
    Jansen, R
    Metzdorf, R
    van der Roest, M
    Fusani, L
    ter Maat, A
    Gahr, M
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2005, 19 (03): : 848 - +
  • [2] "Bird Song Metronomics": lsochronous Organization of Zebra Finch Song Rhythm
    Norton, Philipp
    Scharff, Constance
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10
  • [3] Hormonal and genetic regulation of song system differentiation in the zebra finch
    Wade, Juli
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2011, 25
  • [4] BEHAVIOR-CONTINGENT EXPOSURE TO TAPED SONG AND ZEBRA FINCH SONG LEARNING
    TENCATE, C
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1991, 42 : 857 - 859
  • [5] Zebra Finch Mates Use Their Forebrain Song System in Unlearned Call Communication
    Ter Maat, Andries
    Trost, Lisa
    Sagunsky, Hannes
    Seltmann, Susanne
    Gahr, Manfred
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (10):
  • [6] REGULATION OF THE CIRCADIAN-RHYTHM IN PINEAL MELATONIN PRODUCTION
    ILLNEROVA, H
    VANECEK, J
    PHYSIOLOGIA BOHEMOSLOVACA, 1985, 34 : 57 - 61
  • [7] Temporal precision and temporal drift in brain and behavior of zebra finch song
    Chi, ZY
    Margoliash, D
    NEURON, 2001, 32 (05) : 899 - 910
  • [8] Neural response to bird’s own song and tutor song in the zebra finch field L and caudal mesopallium
    N. Amin
    J. A. Grace
    F. E. Theunissen
    Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 2004, 190 : 469 - 489
  • [9] Neural response to bird's own song and tutor song in the zebra finch field L and caudal mesopallium
    Amin, N
    Grace, JA
    Theunissen, FE
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-NEUROETHOLOGY SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 190 (06): : 469 - 489
  • [10] Brain Expression and Song Regulation of the Cholecystokinin Gene in the Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata)
    Lovell, Peter V.
    Mello, Claudio V.
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 2011, 519 (02) : 211 - 237