Maximizing phylogenetic diversity in biodiversity conservation: Greedy solutions to the Noah's Ark Problem

被引:36
作者
Hartmann, Klaas [1 ]
Steel, Mike [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canterbury, Allan Wilson Ctr Mol Ecol & Evolut, Biomath Res Ctr, Christchurch 1, New Zealand
关键词
biodiversity conservation; greedy algorithm; Noah's Ark Problem; phylogenetic diversity;
D O I
10.1080/10635150600873876
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The Noah's Ark Problem (NAP) is a comprehensive cost-effectiveness methodology for biodiversity conservation that was introduced by Weitzman (1998) and utilizes the phylogenetic tree containing the taxa of interest to assess biodiversity. Given a set of taxa, each of which has a particular survival probability that can be increased at some cost, the NAP seeks to allocate limited funds to conserving these taxa so that the future expected biodiversity is maximized. Finding optimal solutions using this framework is a computationally difficult problem to which a simple and efficient "greedy" algorithm has been proposed in the literature and applied to conservation problems. We show that, although algorithms of this type cannot produce optimal solutions for the general NAP, there are two restricted scenarios of the NAP for which a greedy algorithm is guaranteed to produce optimal solutions. The first scenario requires the taxa to have equal conservation cost; the second scenario requires an ultrametric tree. The NAP assumes a linear relationship between the funding allocated to conservation of a taxon and the increased survival probability of that taxon. This relationship is briefly investigated and one variation is suggested that can also be solved using a greedy algorithm. [Biodiversity conservation; greedy algorithm; Noah's Ark Problem; phylogenetic diversity.]
引用
收藏
页码:644 / 651
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Cormen T.H., 2002, INTRO ALGORITHMS, V2nd
[2]   Preserving the information content of species: Genetic diversity, phylogeny, and conservation worth [J].
Crozier, RH .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1997, 28 :243-268
[3]  
Crozier RH, 2005, EVOL BIOINFORM, V1, P11
[4]  
Faith D. P., 2006, MCGRAWHILL YB SCI TE, P233
[5]   Complementarity, biodiversity viability analysis, and policy-based algorithms for conservation [J].
Faith, DP ;
Carter, G ;
Cassis, G ;
Ferrier, S ;
Wilkie, L .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2003, 6 (03) :311-328
[6]   CONSERVATION EVALUATION AND PHYLOGENETIC DIVERSITY [J].
FAITH, DP .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1992, 61 (01) :1-10
[7]  
FAITH DP, 2006, EVOL BIOINFORM ONLIN, V2, P70
[8]  
Gaston Kevin J., 1996, P77
[9]  
HAAKE CJ, 2005, 363 IMW
[10]  
HARTMANN K, 2006, NEW MATH MODELS EVOL