Assessing demographic and epidemiologic parameters of rural dog populations in India during mass vaccination campaigns

被引:66
作者
Belsare, Aniruddha V. [1 ]
Gompper, Matthew E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
Dog; Mass vaccination; Rabies; Canine distemper; Canine parvovirus; Canine adenovirus; DOMESTIC DOGS; RABIES CONTROL; DISEASE; ECOLOGY; AFRICA; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.04.003
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Mass vaccination of dogs is a mainstay for efforts to control rabies and other viral pathogens. The success of such programs is a function of the ability to vaccinate sufficient proportions of animals to develop herd immunity. However, fully assessing success in reaching target vaccination-levels and in understanding the outcome of mass vaccination efforts is hindered if insufficient information is available on the demographics of dog populations and the prevalence of the targeted pathogens. While such information can sometimes be gained from questionnaire surveys, greater precision requires direct assessment of the dog populations. Here we show how such information can be gained from surveys of dogs conducted in association with mass-vaccination programs. We conducted surveys of dogs in six villages in rural Maharashtra, India, between February and July 2011 as part of an effort to reduce the risk of human rabies and virus transmission from dogs to wildlife. Mass vaccination efforts were conducted in each village, and paired with blood sample collection and photographic mark-recapture approaches to gain epidemiologic and demographic data. This data in turn facilitated estimates of dog abundance, population density and structure, vaccination coverage, and seroprevalence of antibodies against canine adenovirus (CAV), canine parvovirus (CPV), and canine distemper virus (CDV). The median dog population size for the six villages was 134 (range 90-188), the median dog population density was 719 dogs per km(2) (range 526-969), and the median human:dog ratio for these six villages was 34 (range 30-47). The median household:dog ratio for the six villages was 6 (range 5-8). Following vaccination efforts, the median vaccination coverage achieved was 34% (range 24-42%). The dog populations consisted mostly of adult dogs (67-86%) and the median sex ratio for the study area was male biased (1.55 males per female; range 0.9-2.5). The seroprevalence of antibodies against CAV, CPV and CDV was 68,88 and 73%, respectively. Mass vaccination campaigns provide an opportunity to obtain vital epidemiological and demographic data, and develop a clearer understanding of the threats and impacts of diseases and disease control measures. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 146
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Demography of domestic dogs in rural and urban areas of the Coquimbo region of Chile and implications for disease transmission [J].
Acosta-Jamett, G. ;
Cleaveland, S. ;
Cunningham, A. A. ;
Bronsvoort, B. M. deC. .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2010, 94 (3-4) :272-281
[2]  
Barker Ian K., 2001, P131, DOI 10.1002/9780470344880.ch6
[3]  
Beck A., 1973, The Ecology of Stray Dogs: A Study of Free-ranging Urban Animals
[4]  
Cleaveland S., 1996, IUCN/SSC Veterinary Specialist Group Newsletter, V12, P2
[5]  
Cleaveland S., 2002, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V80, P7
[6]   Canine vaccination - Providing broader benefits for disease control [J].
Cleaveland, Sarah ;
Kaare, Magai ;
Knobel, Darryn ;
Laurenson, M. Karen .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 117 (01) :43-50
[7]   Estimating the public health impact of rabies [J].
Coleman, PG ;
Fèvre, EM ;
Cleaveland, S .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 10 (01) :140-142
[8]   Immunization coverage required to prevent outbreaks of dog rabies [J].
Coleman, PG ;
Dye, C .
VACCINE, 1996, 14 (03) :185-186
[9]   THE SOCIAL-ORGANIZATION OF FREE-RANGING URBAN DOGS .1. NON-ESTROUS SOCIAL-BEHAVIOR [J].
DANIELS, TJ .
APPLIED ANIMAL ETHOLOGY, 1983, 10 (04) :341-363
[10]   WSAVA Guidelines for the Vaccination of Dogs and Cats [J].
Day, M. J. ;
Horzinek, M. C. ;
Schultz, R. D. .
JOURNAL OF SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE, 2010, 51 (06) :338-356