After the revolution: Welfare patterns since TANF implementation

被引:20
作者
Cancian, M
Meyer, DR
Wu, CF
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Social Work, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Robert M La Follette Sch Publ Affairs, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Inst Res Poverty, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Sch Social Work, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
poverty; single mothers; social policy; TANF; welfare;
D O I
10.1093/swr/29.4.199
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Welfare programs changed dramatically in 1996. Caseloads dropped by more than 9 million recipients over an eight-year period, and millions entered the labor market in the wake of these changes. Since the start of the "welfare revolution" research has emerged to document the new ways former welfare recipients are using federal entitlement programs as they navigate and negotiate the "post-AFDC" era. In this article, the authors examine patterns of participation in TANF, the Food Stamp program, and Medicaid in Wisconsin. Very distinct patterns of participation emerged among the three programs: a single short period of receipt was common for TANF, cycling was typical for food stamps, and a long spell was the standard for Medicaid. The authors also explored multiple program participation over a three-year period. Analysis revealed interactions and transitions not normally considered in this line of research. One key finding was the high number of transitions on and off benefits during these three years when the three programs were considered simultaneously. Policy implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 214
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Acs G., 2001, INITIAL SYNTHESIS RE
[2]   Social work advocacy in the post-TANF environment: Lessons from early TANF research studies [J].
Anderson, SG ;
Gryzlak, BM .
SOCIAL WORK, 2002, 47 (03) :301-314
[3]  
Bane M.J., 1994, WELFARE REALITIES RH
[4]  
BARTFELD J, 2002, 125302 IRP
[5]  
BATTLE K, 2001, BENEFITS CHILDREN 4, P93
[6]   When do women use aid to families with dependent children and food stamps? The dynamics of eligibility versus participation [J].
Blank, RM ;
Ruggles, P .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 1996, 31 (01) :57-89
[7]   Pretrial publicity and civil cases: A two-way street? [J].
Bornstein, BH ;
Whisenhunt, BL ;
Nemeth, RJ ;
Dunaway, DL .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2002, 26 (01) :3-17
[8]  
BURLEY M, 2001, WELFARE CASELOAD TRE
[9]   Before and after TANF: The economic well-being of women leaving welfare [J].
Cancian, M ;
Haveman, RH ;
Meyer, DR ;
Wolfe, B .
SOCIAL SERVICE REVIEW, 2002, 76 (04) :603-641
[10]  
CANCIAN M, 1999, 75 IRP