Permanent mechanical circulatory support in patients of advanced age

被引:37
作者
Jurmann, MJ [1 ]
Weng, Y [1 ]
Drews, T [1 ]
Pasic, M [1 ]
Hennig, E [1 ]
Hetzer, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Deutsch Herzzentrum Berlin, Dept Cardiothorac & Vasc Surg, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
关键词
heart failure; cardiogenic shock; cardiac transplantation; left ventricular assist device; ventricular assist device; circulatory support;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.01.017
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: This study details our initial results of long-term left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support in patients suffering from catecholamine-dependent end-stage heart failure or cardiogenic shock with age above 65 years or age above 60 and contraindications to cardiac transplantation. Methods: Between September 2000 and July 2002, 27 patients received implantation of left ventricular assist devices (Micromed DeBakey (n = 15), Berlin Heart Excor (n = 6), Arrow Lion Heart (n = 4) and Novacor N100 (n = 2)). The mean age of this group was 66.2 +/- 4.1 (60-77) years. The patients presented with the following features by the time of LVAD implantation: failure of weaning from inotropic support (78%), either profound cardiogenic shock (37%) or instable hemodynamic status (22%), high-dose inotropic (52%) or intraaortic balloon pump support (11%), dialysis (15%), artificial ventilation (15%), and at least one previous cardiac procedure (44%). Results: The cumulative survival rate for the whole group was 63% at 30 days, 30% at 180 days, and 22% at 2 years. The presence of preoperative cardiogenic shock was associated with a higher perioperative mortality rate. Late complications (n = 7) included replacement of two thrombosed DeBakey LVADs and five late deaths secondary to thrombembolism/intracranial hemorrhage (DeBakey LVAD, n = 3) or septicemia (n = 2). As of May 15, 2003, six patients remain on LVAD support for an average of 653 (339-953) days, three patients now for more than 2 years. Ten patients were discharged home to spend 73% of their life span on out-of-hospital long-term LVAD support. Conclusion: This study reports the first single-center experience of permanent LVAD support in patients of advanced age. For this initial experience, many patients with critical circulatory status and previous cardiac operations were included and a high postoperative mortality rate was encountered among them. Older age and associated multimorbidity are the key determinants rendering the conditions of LVAD therapy for this patient cohort to be different from the bridge-to-transplant experience. The LVADs employed in this study showed different capabilities with regard to long-term support. Our experience shows that permanent mechanical circulatory support does have the potential to evolve as a treatment option in selected elderly patients with end-stage heart failure. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:610 / 618
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mechanical circulatory support improves diabetic control in patients with advanced heart failure
    Mohamedali, Burhan
    Yost, Gardner
    Bhat, Geetha
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2014, 16 (10) : 1120 - 1124
  • [32] Mechanical circulatory support for elderly heart failure patients
    Butler, Craig R.
    Jugdutt, Bodh I.
    HEART FAILURE REVIEWS, 2012, 17 (4-5) : 663 - 669
  • [33] Electrophysiological alterations after mechanical circulatory support in patients with advanced cardiac failure
    Harding, JD
    Piacentino, V
    Gaughan, JP
    Houser, SR
    Margulies, KB
    CIRCULATION, 2001, 104 (11) : 1241 - 1247
  • [34] Infections in Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support
    Eichenberger, Emily M.
    Phadke, Varun
    Busch, Lindsay M.
    Pouch, Stephanie M.
    INFECTIOUS DISEASE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 38 (04) : 693 - 712
  • [35] Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes
    Abiragi, Michael
    Singer-Englar, Tahli
    Cole, Robert M. M.
    Emerson, Dominic
    Esmailian, Fardad
    Megna, Dominick
    Moriguchi, Jaime
    Kobashigawa, Jon A. A.
    Kittleson, Michelle M. M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (04)
  • [36] The future of mechanical circulatory support for advanced heart failure
    Marinescu, Karolina K.
    Uriel, Nir
    Adatya, Sirtaz
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 31 (03) : 321 - 328
  • [37] Mechanical Circulatory Support: When and How to Use It
    Kanduri, Jaya
    Axman, Rachel
    Lu, Daniel Y.
    Feldman, Dmitriy N.
    Kim, Luke K.
    CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 25 (05) : 111 - 126
  • [38] Circulatory mechanical support. State of the art
    Mc-Nab M, Paul
    Castro G, Pablo
    Zalaquett S, Ricardo
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2006, 134 (10) : 1330 - 1337
  • [39] Mechanical circulatory support in the heart failure population
    Nazzari, Hamed
    Chue, Colin D.
    Toma, Mustafa
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 34 (02) : 194 - 201
  • [40] Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Transplant Candidacy
    Elhenawy, Abdelsalam M.
    Algarni, Khaled D.
    Rodger, Marnie
    MacIver, Jane
    Maganti, Manjula
    Cusimano, Robert J.
    Yau, Terrence M.
    Delgado, Diego H.
    Ross, Heather J.
    Rao, Vivek
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2011, 26 (05) : 542 - 547