Permanent mechanical circulatory support in patients of advanced age

被引:37
|
作者
Jurmann, MJ [1 ]
Weng, Y [1 ]
Drews, T [1 ]
Pasic, M [1 ]
Hennig, E [1 ]
Hetzer, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Deutsch Herzzentrum Berlin, Dept Cardiothorac & Vasc Surg, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
关键词
heart failure; cardiogenic shock; cardiac transplantation; left ventricular assist device; ventricular assist device; circulatory support;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.01.017
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: This study details our initial results of long-term left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support in patients suffering from catecholamine-dependent end-stage heart failure or cardiogenic shock with age above 65 years or age above 60 and contraindications to cardiac transplantation. Methods: Between September 2000 and July 2002, 27 patients received implantation of left ventricular assist devices (Micromed DeBakey (n = 15), Berlin Heart Excor (n = 6), Arrow Lion Heart (n = 4) and Novacor N100 (n = 2)). The mean age of this group was 66.2 +/- 4.1 (60-77) years. The patients presented with the following features by the time of LVAD implantation: failure of weaning from inotropic support (78%), either profound cardiogenic shock (37%) or instable hemodynamic status (22%), high-dose inotropic (52%) or intraaortic balloon pump support (11%), dialysis (15%), artificial ventilation (15%), and at least one previous cardiac procedure (44%). Results: The cumulative survival rate for the whole group was 63% at 30 days, 30% at 180 days, and 22% at 2 years. The presence of preoperative cardiogenic shock was associated with a higher perioperative mortality rate. Late complications (n = 7) included replacement of two thrombosed DeBakey LVADs and five late deaths secondary to thrombembolism/intracranial hemorrhage (DeBakey LVAD, n = 3) or septicemia (n = 2). As of May 15, 2003, six patients remain on LVAD support for an average of 653 (339-953) days, three patients now for more than 2 years. Ten patients were discharged home to spend 73% of their life span on out-of-hospital long-term LVAD support. Conclusion: This study reports the first single-center experience of permanent LVAD support in patients of advanced age. For this initial experience, many patients with critical circulatory status and previous cardiac operations were included and a high postoperative mortality rate was encountered among them. Older age and associated multimorbidity are the key determinants rendering the conditions of LVAD therapy for this patient cohort to be different from the bridge-to-transplant experience. The LVADs employed in this study showed different capabilities with regard to long-term support. Our experience shows that permanent mechanical circulatory support does have the potential to evolve as a treatment option in selected elderly patients with end-stage heart failure. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:610 / 618
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The role of temporary mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to advanced heart failure therapies or recovery
    Oren, Daniel
    Zilinyi, Robert
    Lotan, Dor
    Uriel, Matan
    Uriel, Nir
    Sayer, Gabriel
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 37 (05) : 394 - 402
  • [22] Clinical and histopathological effects of heart failure drug therapy in advanced heart failure patients on chronic mechanical circulatory support
    Catino, Anna B.
    Ferrin, Peter
    Wever-Pinzon, James
    Horne, Benjamin D.
    Wever-Pinzon, Omar
    Kfoury, Abdallah G.
    McCreath, Lauren
    Diakos, Nikolaos A.
    McKellar, Stephen
    Koliopoulou, Antigone
    Bonios, Michael J.
    Al-Sarie, Mohammad
    Taleb, Iosif
    Dranow, Elizabeth
    Fang, James C.
    Drakos, Stavros G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2018, 20 (01) : 164 - 174
  • [23] Biomarkers in Advanced Heart Failure Implications for Managing Patients With Mechanical Circulatory Support and Cardiac Transplantation
    Loungani, Rahul S.
    Mentz, Robert J.
    Agarwal, Richa
    DeVore, Adam D.
    Patel, Chetan B.
    Rogers, Joseph G.
    Russell, Stuart D.
    Felker, G. Michael
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2020, 13 (07) : 177 - 186
  • [24] Patient selection for mechanical circulatory support
    Gilotra, Nisha A.
    Russell, Stuart D.
    HEART FAILURE REVIEWS, 2013, 18 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [25] Advancements in mechanical circulatory support for patients in acute and chronic heart failure
    Csepe, Thomas A.
    Kilic, Ahmet
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2017, 9 (10) : 4070 - 4083
  • [26] Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock
    Werdan, Karl
    Gielen, Stephan
    Ebelt, Henning
    Hochman, Judith S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (03) : 156 - +
  • [27] Myocardial recovery with mechanical circulatory support
    Chaggar, Parminder S.
    Williams, Simon G.
    Yonan, Nizar
    Fildes, James
    Venkateswaran, Rajamiyer
    Shaw, Steven M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2016, 18 (10) : 1220 - 1227
  • [28] Mechanical Circulatory Support
    Greenwood, John C.
    Herr, Daniel L.
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 32 (04) : 851 - +
  • [29] Nutrition support for patients on mechanical circulatory support
    Dresen, Ellen
    Modir, Ranna
    Stoppe, Christian
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 37 (01) : 24 - 34
  • [30] Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: Left, Right, and Biventricular Devices
    Dangl, Michael
    Albosta, Michael
    Butros, Hoda
    Loebe, Matthias
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2023, 19 (05) : 27 - 42