Permanent mechanical circulatory support in patients of advanced age

被引:37
|
作者
Jurmann, MJ [1 ]
Weng, Y [1 ]
Drews, T [1 ]
Pasic, M [1 ]
Hennig, E [1 ]
Hetzer, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Deutsch Herzzentrum Berlin, Dept Cardiothorac & Vasc Surg, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
关键词
heart failure; cardiogenic shock; cardiac transplantation; left ventricular assist device; ventricular assist device; circulatory support;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.01.017
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: This study details our initial results of long-term left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support in patients suffering from catecholamine-dependent end-stage heart failure or cardiogenic shock with age above 65 years or age above 60 and contraindications to cardiac transplantation. Methods: Between September 2000 and July 2002, 27 patients received implantation of left ventricular assist devices (Micromed DeBakey (n = 15), Berlin Heart Excor (n = 6), Arrow Lion Heart (n = 4) and Novacor N100 (n = 2)). The mean age of this group was 66.2 +/- 4.1 (60-77) years. The patients presented with the following features by the time of LVAD implantation: failure of weaning from inotropic support (78%), either profound cardiogenic shock (37%) or instable hemodynamic status (22%), high-dose inotropic (52%) or intraaortic balloon pump support (11%), dialysis (15%), artificial ventilation (15%), and at least one previous cardiac procedure (44%). Results: The cumulative survival rate for the whole group was 63% at 30 days, 30% at 180 days, and 22% at 2 years. The presence of preoperative cardiogenic shock was associated with a higher perioperative mortality rate. Late complications (n = 7) included replacement of two thrombosed DeBakey LVADs and five late deaths secondary to thrombembolism/intracranial hemorrhage (DeBakey LVAD, n = 3) or septicemia (n = 2). As of May 15, 2003, six patients remain on LVAD support for an average of 653 (339-953) days, three patients now for more than 2 years. Ten patients were discharged home to spend 73% of their life span on out-of-hospital long-term LVAD support. Conclusion: This study reports the first single-center experience of permanent LVAD support in patients of advanced age. For this initial experience, many patients with critical circulatory status and previous cardiac operations were included and a high postoperative mortality rate was encountered among them. Older age and associated multimorbidity are the key determinants rendering the conditions of LVAD therapy for this patient cohort to be different from the bridge-to-transplant experience. The LVADs employed in this study showed different capabilities with regard to long-term support. Our experience shows that permanent mechanical circulatory support does have the potential to evolve as a treatment option in selected elderly patients with end-stage heart failure. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:610 / 618
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mechanical circulatory support in patients of advanced age
    Drews, Thorsten
    Stepanenko, Alexander
    Dandel, Michael
    Buz, Semih
    Lehmkuhl, Hans Brendan
    Hetzer, Roland
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2010, 12 (09) : 990 - 994
  • [2] Mechanical Circulatory Support for Advanced Heart Failure Patients and Technology in Evolution
    Stewart, Garrick C.
    Givertz, Michael M.
    CIRCULATION, 2012, 125 (10) : 1304 - 1315
  • [3] Impact of Mechanical Circulatory Support on Exercise Capacity in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure
    Huang, Janice
    McDonnell, Barry J.
    Lawley, Justin S.
    Byrd, Jessica
    Stohr, Eric J.
    Cornwell, William K., III
    EXERCISE AND SPORT SCIENCES REVIEWS, 2022, 50 (04): : 222 - 229
  • [4] Mechanical Circulatory Support for Patients With Adult Congenital Heart Disease
    Haranal, Maruti
    Luo, Shuhua
    Honjo, Osami
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2020, 84 (04) : 533 - 541
  • [5] Noncardiac Surgery in Patients on Mechanical Circulatory Support
    Taghavi, Sharven
    Beyer, Carl
    Vora, Haley
    Jayarajan, Senthil N.
    Toyoda, Yoshiya
    Dujon, Jay
    Sjoholm, Lars O.
    Pathak, Abhijit
    Santora, Thomas A.
    Goldberg, Amy J.
    Rapold, Joseph F.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2014, 60 (06) : 670 - 674
  • [6] Mechanical circulatory support for advanced heart failure
    Patel C.B.
    Alexander K.M.
    Rogers J.G.
    Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2010, 12 (6) : 549 - 565
  • [7] A contemporary review of mechanical circulatory support
    Patel, Chetan B.
    Cowger, Jennifer A.
    Zuckermann, Andreas
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 33 (07): : 667 - 674
  • [8] Mechanical Circulatory Support
    Tam, Christopher W.
    Shen, Liang
    Zeidman, Amanda Dijanic
    Srivastava, Ankur
    Ivascu, Natalia S.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 17 (06): : 890 - 901
  • [9] Mechanical circulatory support devices in advanced heart failure: 2020 and beyond
    Vieira, Jefferson L.
    Ventura, Hector O.
    Mehra, Mandeep R.
    PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2020, 63 (05) : 630 - 639
  • [10] Mechanical circulatory support devices in geriatric patients: more than just age
    Notarianni, Andrew
    Patel, Bhoumesh
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 35 (01) : 105 - 108