The Impact of Corneal Edema on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, Tono-Pen XL, iCare, and ORA: An In Vitro Model

被引:45
作者
Neuburger, Matthias [1 ]
Maier, Philip [1 ]
Boehringer, Daniel [1 ]
Reinhard, Thomas [1 ]
Jordan, Jens F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Eye Hosp, D-79106 Freiburg, Baden Wurttembe, Germany
关键词
corneal edema; iCare; ocular response analyzer; Goldmann applanation tonometry; Tono-Pen XL; DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETRY; OCULAR-RESPONSE-ANALYZER; ANGLE-CLOSURE GLAUCOMA; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; REBOUND TONOMETRY; THICKNESS; HYSTERESIS; REDUCTION; CURVATURE; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1097/IJG.0b013e31824cef11
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: Among other corneal biomechanical properties, Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) has been shown to depend on corneal edema. New tonometry devices have been designed, such as the Tono-Pen XL, iCare, and ocular response analyzer (ORA), to measure the intraocular pressure (IOP) accurately. This study aims to investigate the influence of corneal edema on the accuracy of these IOP-measuring devices in an in vitro model. Methods: A model of an artificial anterior chamber was developed using a guided trephination system. Eight donor corneas not suitable for keratoplasty were clamped into this artificial anterior chamber. All corneas showed signs of stromal edema. Intracameral pressure (ICP) was adjusted manometrically to 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 mm Hg. The central corneal thickness (CCT) was determined by ultrasonic pachymetry. For each manometrically defined ICP, tonometry was performed using the iCare, Tono-Pen XL, GAT, and ORA. Results: The mean CCT increased from 616.1 +/- 29.6 mu m to 626.9 +/- 36.1 mu m. At 10 mm Hg, GAT yielded a higher ICP than those manometrically adjusted (10.4 +/- 3.3 mm Hg); at all other ICP levels, GAT yielded lower ICP levels than those adjusted. The Tono-Pen XL and iCare showed the greatest difference at 10 mm Hg, with the Tono-Pen XL yielding a value of 14.0 +/- 4.0 mm Hg and the iCare yielding a value of 12.5 +/- 2.6 mm Hg. All other results of the 2 devices fell within a range of +/- 2 mm Hg from the adjusted ICP. The ORA provided accurate results only at "physiological" ICP levels with a maximum difference of 2.6 mm Hg at 30 mm Hg. At higher ICP levels, corneal hysteresis decreased significantly with increasing ICP. None of the measurement devices revealed a statistically relevant dependence on CCT in this experimental setting. Conclusions: The Tono-Pen XL and the iCare yielded the most accurate ICP values across all the adjusted ICP values. This may be because of their relatively small contact area with the cornea and, consequently, greater independence from corneal biomechanical properties. The ORA yielded accurate measurement results only at physiological ICP levels. As anticipated, GAT underestimated ICP. The Tono-Pen XL and the iCare should therefore be used to determine IOP in patients suffering from corneal edema, such as bullous keratopathy or Fuchs endothelial dystrophy.
引用
收藏
页码:584 / 590
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[21]   Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer [J].
Luce, DA .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 31 (01) :156-162
[22]  
Madjlessi F, 2000, OPHTHALMOLOGE, V97, P478, DOI 10.1007/s003470070078
[23]   Correlations between corneal biomechanical properties measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer and ICare rebound tonometry [J].
Martins Jorge, Jorge Manuel ;
Gonzalez-Meijome, Jose M. ;
Queiros, Antonio ;
Fernandes, Paulo ;
Parafita, Manuel A. .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2008, 17 (06) :442-448
[24]   Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on Intraocular pressure measurements using the Ocular Response Analyzer [J].
Medeiros, Felipe A. ;
Weinreb, Robert N. .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2006, 15 (05) :364-370
[25]   CLINICAL COMPARISON OF THE PROTON AND TONO-PEN TONOMETERS WITH THE GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER [J].
MIDELFART, A ;
WIGERS, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1994, 78 (12) :895-898
[26]   Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer over a wide IOP range [J].
Munkwitz, S. ;
Elkarmouty, A. ;
Hoffmann, E. M. ;
Pfeiffer, N. ;
Thieme, H. .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 246 (06) :875-879
[27]   Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers [J].
Nakamura, Makoto ;
Darhad, Urtogtah ;
Tatsumi, Yasuko ;
Fujioka, Miyuki ;
Kusuhara, Azusa ;
Maeda, Hidetaka ;
Negi, Akira .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 142 (02) :332-334
[28]   Recovery of Corneal Hysteresis After Reduction of Intraocular Pressure in Chronic Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma [J].
Neuburger, Matthias ;
Boehringer, Daniel ;
Reinhard, Thomas ;
Jordan, Jens F. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 149 (04) :687-688
[29]   The effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry [J].
Oh, Jong-Hyun ;
Yoo, Chungkwon ;
Kim, Yong Yeon ;
Kim, Hyo-Myung ;
Song, Jong-Suk .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 247 (03) :371-375
[30]   Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study [J].
Pache, M ;
Wilmsmeyer, S ;
Lautebach, S ;
Funk, J .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 243 (08) :763-767